You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 2, August 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (56)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Immediate Hemodynamic Effects of Gram-Negative vs Gram-Positive Bacteremia in Man

Charlotte M. Blain, MD; Truman O. Anderson, MD, PhD; Raymond J. Pietras, MD; Rolf M. Gunnar, MS, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1970;126(2):260-265.


Abstract

Hemodynamic measurements were made in 29 patients undergoing 31 episodes of genitourinary instrumentation. The conditions of two patients were studied twice during separate surgical episodes. Bacteremia developed with 21 procedures, gram-negative organisms in eight procedures, gram-positive organisms in ten, and both gram-negative and gram-positive organisms in three procedures. Three patients manifested clinical shock. Immediate hemodynamic effects of gram-negative bacteremia are a decrease in systemic vascular resistance and central venous pressure and an increase in cardiac output. Clinical shock is an exaggeration of these changes, but the fall in central venous pressure prevents the cardiac output from compensating for the fall in systemic vascular resistance. Patients with gram-positive bacteremia and abacteremic patients undergoing similar instrumentations do not demonstrate comparable hemodynamic changes.



Author Affiliations

Chicago

From the Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine; and the Section of Immunology of the Hektoen Institute for Medical Research of the Cook County Hospital (Drs. Blain and Anderson), Chicago.


Footnotes

Received for publication Feb 27, 1970; accepted April 22.

Reprint requests to 1825 W Harrison St, Chicago 60612 (Dr. Gunnar).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Last 100 Years of Sepsis
Vincent and Abraham
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006;173:256-263.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Manifestations of Sepsis
Harris et al.
Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1895-1906.
ABSTRACT  

Physiology and Metabolism in Isolated Viral Septicemia: Further Evidence of an Organism-Independent, Host-Dependent Response
Deutschman et al.
Arch Surg 1987;122:21-25.
ABSTRACT  

Hemodynamic Characteristics of Patients with Hypothermia Due to Occult Infection and Other Causes
MORRIS et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1985;102:153-157.
ABSTRACT  

Bacterial Shock
Shubin and Weil
JAMA 1976;235:421-424.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1970 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.