 |
 |

Evaluation of Model Systems for Study of Airway Epithelium, Cilia, and Mucus
Lynne Reid, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1970;126(3):428-434.
Abstract
An animal "model" of human lung disease provides a means of testing the effect of irritants and of study in pathogenesis. To relate the model to human lung disease it is necessary to establish the morbid anatomy of the disease. The airway lining system which is under scrutiny here is a. mucus-secreting surface appropriate for the study of chronic bronchitis, the main features of which in man are hypertrophy of mucus-secreting cells, increase in number of goblet cells and extension to the periphery, and an increase in cell activity. The mitotic count is raised and the type of acid glycoprotein modified. These changes can be quantified. They can be reproduced in the experimental animal. The rat is chiefly dealt with here as it has been studied in most detail.
Author Affiliations
London
From the Department of Experimental Pathology, Institute of Diseases of the Chest, Brompton Hospital, London SW 3, England.
Footnotes
Received for publication Dec 22, 1969; accepted April 22, 1970.
Read before the session entitled Mucociliary Responses (William M. Thurlbeck, MB, ChB, chairman) of the workshop on Pulmonary Responses to Inhaled Materials: An Evaluation of Model Systems, Castle Harbour, Bermuda, Oct 23,1969.
Reprint requests to Department of Experimental Pathology, Brompton Institute and Brompton Hospital, London SW 3, England (Dr. Reid).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Does Deficiency of Arylsulfatase B Have a Role in Cystic Fibrosis?
Tobacman
Chest 2003;123:2130-2139.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Variable Pulmonary Responses from Exposure to Concentrated Ambient Air Particles in a Rat Model of Bronchitis
Kodavanti et al.
Toxicol Sci 2000;54:441-451.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Explosive Asthma in the Infant and Young Child Under Two Years: Clinical Features, Anatomic and Physiologic Peculiarities
Lecks
CLIN PEDIATR 1976;15:135-161.
|