You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 1, January 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  SYMPOSIUM ON MYELOMA
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Remission Maintenance Therapy for Multiple Myeloma

Southwest Oncology Group Study

Arch Intern Med. 1975;135(1):147-152.


Abstract

The effects of various regimens of melphalan combination chemotherapy were evaluated in 508 patients with multiple myeloma. No value was confirmed from the addition of procarbazine or vincristine sulfate to melphalan-prednisone combinations. Ninety-six patients who responded to treatment were allocated at random to one of three maintenance regimens, namely intermittent courses of carmustine with prednisone, continued courses of melphalan with prednisone, or no chemotherapy. There were no differences in the frequency of relapse, the remission duration, or the survival time among these maintenance groups. The frequencies of pneumonia and herpes zoster were higher in patients receiving continued chemotherapy. Continued melphalan-prednisone chemotherapy after the first year is of no major value to responding patients with multiple myeloma. Attempts to reduce tumor mass maximally with a change in therapy are justified.



Author Affiliations

Written by Raymond Alexanian, MD, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital, Houston; Stanley Balcerzak, MD, Ohio State University, Columbus; Arthur Haut, MD, University of Arkansas Medical Center, Little Rock; James Hewlett, MD, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and Edmund Gehan, PhD, Southwest Oncology Group Biostatistical Office, Houston.


Footnotes

Received for publication Feb 20, 1974; accepted May 16.

For a complete listing of institutions, see page 152.

Read before the Symposium on Myeloma, Atlanta, Oct 23, 1973.

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, Houston, TX 77025 (Dr. Alexanian).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Based on Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART): Consensus Statement
Dispenzieri et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:323-341.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma
Attal et al.
Blood 2006;108:3289-3294.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Study of the effect of standardized chemotherapy order forms on prescribing errors and anti-emetic cost
Sano et al.
J Oncol Pharm Pract 2005;11:21-30.
ABSTRACT  

Maintenance therapy with alternate-day prednisone improves survival in multiple myeloma patients
Berenson et al.
Blood 2002;99:3163-3168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Issues in Cancer: Multiple myeloma
MacLennan et al.
BMJ 1994;308:1033-1036.
FULL TEXT  

Acute Leukemia in Multiple Myeloma
GONZALEZ et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1977;86:440-443.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.