You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 1, January 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (25)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Staphylococcus aureus Bacteriuria

Patrick J. Demuth, MD; Dale N. Gerding, MD; Kent Crossley, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1979;139(1):78-80.


Abstract

One hundred twenty-seven episodes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria were reviewed retrospectively in two hospitals to establish the rate of occurrence, clinical importance, and associated predisposing factors. Staphylococcus aureus was an infrequent urinary isolate, and accounted for only about 1% of all positive urine cultures. Although almost all cases in a Veterans Hospital occurred in elderly men, episodes in a community nospital were observed in women and children as well. Patients usually had pyuria (71%), but only 39% had urinary symptoms or fever. Among predisposing factors, serious underlying diseases were uncommon, but urinary tract manipulations or abnormalities were present in nearly two thirds of patients. Fifty-five percent of cases were nosocomial, and 73% of these were associated with urinary catheterization or other invasive urinary tract procedures. Most patients (61%) were not treated for their bacteriuria, and there was a secondary bacteremia rate of 5.5% in the Veterans Hospital. Although infrequently encountered, the presence of S aureus in urine should be treated with at least as much concern as more frequently encountered bacteria.

(Arch Intern Med 139:78-80, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Infectious Disease Section, Department of Medicine, Veterans Administration Hospital, Minneapolis (Dr Gerding); St Paul-Ramsey Hospital, St Paul, Minn (Dr Crossley); and University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis (Drs Demuth, Gerding, and Crossley).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 19, 1978.

Reprint requests to Infectious Disease Section, Veterans Administration Hospital, 54th St and 48th Ave S, Minneapolis, MN 55417 (Dr Gerding).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Staphylococcal Bacteremia and Endocarditis: State of the Art
Bayer
Arch Intern Med 1982;142:1169-1177.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.