You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 5, May 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (25)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Hypertension Continuation Adherence

Natural History and Role as an Indicator Condition

Peter Rudd, MD; Viviana Tul; Katie Brown; Stephen M. Davidson, PhD; Gerald J. Bostwick, Jr, MSW

Arch Intern Med. 1979;139(5):545-549.


Abstract



We analyzed a random sample of general medicine clinic patients to determine the natural history of newly treated hypertensive (NH) patients: discontinuation patterns, critical intervention periods, and hypertension's (HBP) utility as an indicator condition. The NH patients exhibited a 48% dropout rate in the first year and better continuation adherence than new nonhypertensive (NNH) patients. Patients with HBP and other chronic diseases had better continuation adherence than those with HBP alone, although no predictive patterns emerged. New patients displayed rapid early discontinuation, with further linear decline by four months for NNH and by eight months for NH patients. All patients showed similar subsequent falloff: linear annual decline at 13% to 36%. We conclude that discontinuation rates are unacceptably high, that interventions must be continued throughout treatment, and that HBP has limited utility as an indicator chronic disease.

(Arch Intern Med 139:545-549, 1979)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Medicine (Drs Rudd and Davidson and Ms Tul) and School of Social Service Administration (Dr Davidson and Mr Bostwick), University of Chicago. Dr Rudd and Ms Tul are now with Stanford (Calif) University Medical Center.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Nov 15, 1978.

Read in part at the National Conference on High Blood Pressure Control, Los Angeles, April 3, 1978.

Reprint requests to Room S-169, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305 (Dr Rudd).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Discrepancies in the Use of Medications: Their Extent and Predictors in an Outpatient Practice
Bedell et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2129-2134.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Continuity of Care in Hypertension: An Important Correlate of Blood Pressure Control Among Aware Hypertensives
McClellan et al.
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:525-528.
ABSTRACT  

Understanding and Improving Patient Compliance
ERAKER et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1984;100:258-268.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.