This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on Web of Science (4)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Lewis M. Drusin, MD, MPH; Barbara Topf-Olstein, RN, MA; Ellen Levy-Zombek, RN

Arch Intern Med. 1979;139(8):901-904.

Abstract
In 19 of 20 patients in whom the correct diagnosis of primary or secondary syphilis was not obvious initially, a positive routine admission VDRL test result was the first indication of the correct diagnosis. A retrospective study during a one-month period to correlate hospital admissions by clinical service with required routine admission serologic tests for syphilis disclosed an overall compliance rate of only 37.1% (range, 94.6% to 8.0%). Of the 38 patients who did have a positive admission VDRL test result, 55.3% were falsely positive. The false-positive rate was slightly higher for weakly reactive titers than it was for higher titers. The routine serologic testing program uncovered 129 and 116 new cases of syphilis during 1976 and 1977, respectively. The decision to continue the routine admission VDRL screening program was made because the consequences of an incorrect diagnosis could be very great for an individual patient.

(Arch Intern Med 139:901-904, 1979)

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Public Health (Dr Drusin and Ms Topf-Olstein) and Medicine (Dr Drusin), Cornell University Medical College, and the Department of Epidemiology, The New York Hospital (Dr Drusin and Mss Topf-Olstein and Levy-Zombek), New York.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Jan 31, 1979.

Reprint requests to Department of Epidemiology, The New York Hospital, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10021 (Dr Drusin).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?