You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 1, January 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Zoster Immune Globulin Prophylaxis of Disseminated Zoster in Compromised Hosts

A Randomized Trial

David A. Stevens, MD; Thomas C. Merigan, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1980;140(1):52-54.


Abstract

• Herpes zoster can be a severe, and sometimes fatal, virus infection in its disseminated form in immunocompromised hosts. Previous studies have suggested that delay in appearance of antibody to varicella-zoster virus occurs as one defect in such patients. In this study, pooled {gamma}-globulin (normal serum globulin [NSG]) and zoster immune globulin ([ZIG] prepared from convalescent zoster patients) were compared for their ability to prevent dissemination of early localized zoster in immunocompromised hosts. Either agent was given intramuscularly in randomized double-blind fashion within nine days of onset of zoster in 97 patients. Despite greater than 100-fold differences in titer of anti-varicella-zoster virus antibody, ZIG did not appear superior to NSG in prophylaxis of dissemination or diminishing postherpetic pain in zoster in immunocompromised hosts. Zoster immune globulin should be reserved for prophylaxis and modification of varicella, where its beneficial effect has been demonstrated.

(Arch Intern Med 140:52-54, 1980)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Stanford (Calif) University School of Medicine (Santa Clara Valley Medical Center and Stanford University Medical Center).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 7, 1979.

The following investigators collaborated in this study: Robert W. Armstrong, MD, Department of Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, Calif; Jane Desforges, MD, Tufts University Medical School, Boston; Burton Janis, MD, University of Utah Medical School, Salt Lake City; Stephen E. Jones, MD, University of Arizona Medical School, Tucson; George W. Jordan, MD, University of California Medical School, Davis; Rupert G. Miller, PhD, Stanford (Calif) Medical School; Elliott Perlin, MD, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Md; Richard B. Pollard, MD, University of Texas Medical School, Galveston; Kenneth H. Rand, MD, University of Florida Medical School, Gainesville; Catherine M. Wilfert, MD, Duke University Medical School, Durham, NC.

Reprint requests to Division of Infectious Diseases, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, 751 S Bascom Ave, San Jose, CA 95128 (Dr Stevens).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Passive Immunity in Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Diseases
Keller and Stiehm
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000;13:602-614.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Shingles: Sorrows, Salves, and Solutions
Straus
JAMA 1993;269:1836-1839.
ABSTRACT  

Intravenous Immunoglobulins as Therapeutic Agents
STIEHM et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1987;107:367-382.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.