You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 2, February 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Twelve Months' Experience With Continuous Ambulatory and Intermittent Peritoneal Dialysis

Christine Lacke, PA-C; Harry O. Senekjian, MD; Thomas F. Knight, MD; Mark Frazier, MD; Robert Hatlelid, MD; Marie Kozak, RN; Phillip Baker, PA-C; Edward J. Weinman, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1981;141(2):187-190.


Abstract

• After a one-year experience with a continuous ambulatory and long-term intermittent peritoneal dialysis (CAPD and IPD, respectively) program in a Veterans Administration hospital, both forms of dialysis provided excellent biochemical control of the patients' conditions. The major drawback to peritoneal dialysis as opposed to hemodialysis is the high rate of rehospitalization resulting from peritonitis or problems related to the peritoneal catheter. The incidence of peritonitis was one episode per 4.1 patient months in CAPD and one episode per 7.3 patient months in IPD. Recurrent episodes of peritonitis in a given patient were associated with a decrease in the serum albumin level. Blood values for BUN, creatinine, serum electrolytes, calcium, and phosphorus, however, were not altered. To date, CAPD appears to be an effective alternative form of dialytic therapy.

(Arch Intern Med 141:187-190, 1981)



Author Affiliations

From the Renal Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine (Ms Lacke, Drs Senekjian, Knight, Frazier, and Hatlelid, Mr Baker, and Dr Weinman), and Nursing Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center (Ms Kozak), Houston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 29, 1980.

Reprint requests to Research Bldg 211, VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77211 (Dr Weinman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis
Council on Scientific Affairs
JAMA 1982;248:2340-2341.
ABSTRACT  

Pseudomonas Peritonitis and Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis
Krothapalli et al.
Arch Intern Med 1982;142:1862-1863.
ABSTRACT  

Staphylococcal Nasal Carriage and Subsequent Infection in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
Sewell et al.
JAMA 1982;248:1493-1495.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.