You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 11, 25 October 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Problem Pathogens
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Piperacillin v Carbenicillin in the Therapy for Serious Infections

Robert L. Marier, MD; Charles V. Sanders, MD; Sebastian Faro, MD, PhD; Aileen Janney, PhD; William W. Williams, MD; Frederick Derks, MD; Kenneth E. Aldridge, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1982;142(11):2000-2005.


Abstract



• One hundred seven patients were treated with either piperacillin (56) or carbenicillin (51) in an open randomized trial of hospitalized patients with pleuropulmonary (40), urinary tract (26), gynecologic (21), skin and soft-tissue (eight), joint (five), bone (three), and miscellaneous other infections (four). Patients with urinary tract infections were given 150 mg/ kg/day of piperacillin sodium or 200 mg/kg/day of carbenicillin sodium in divided doses every six hours intravenously. Patients with other infections were given 250 mg/kg/day of piperacillin sodium and 450 mg/kg/day of carbenicillin sodium; 53/56 (95%) patients treated with piperacillin and 45/51 (88%) patients treated with carbenicillin were cured clinically. In general, the drugs were well tolerated. There were, however, more adverse experiences in the group taking carbenicillin. Of special interest was the finding of liver function test abnormalities in 17/78 (21%) carbenicillin recipients (evaluative and nonevaluative cases). We concluded that piperacillin was effective and safe. It has potential for use in a great variety of infections.

(Arch Intern Med 1982;142:2000-2005)



Author Affiliations



From the Section of Infectious Diseases (Drs Marier, Sanders, Williams, Derks, and Aldridge), Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics-Gynecology (Dr Faro), and Pathology (Dr Janney), Louisiana State University (LSU) Medical Center, New Orleans.


Footnotes



Reprint requests to LSU School of Medicine, 1542 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112 (Dr Marier).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Urinary Tract Infections in Women: Diagnosis and Treatment
Johnson and Stamm
ANN INTERN MED 1989;111:906-917.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.