You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 4, April 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparative Efficacy of Colestipol and Clofibrate in Type IIa Hyperlipoproteinemia

Thomas J. Vecchio, MD; Christine V. Linden, MS; Martin J. O'Connell, PhD; Jill Heilman, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 1982;142(4):721-723.


Abstract

• A multiclinic study was performed comparing colestipol hydrochloride, clofibrate, and placebo in 245 patients with type IIa hyperlipoproteinemia. Eighty-five subjects took colestipol hydrochloride in progressive doses of 15, 20, and 30 g/day; 87 took 2.0 g/day of clofibrate; and 73 took placebo over the six months of study. Colestipol lowered total cholesterol level 20.9% in comparison with clofibrate (14.6%) (statistically significant at months 3, 5, and 6), and lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level 28.8% in comparison with clofibrate (14.8%) (significant at months 2, 4, and 6, all times measured). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol level remained unchanged in all groups. Clofibrate lowered total triglyceride levels 22.5%, compared with an increase of 12.5% in the colestipol group and 11.1% in the placebo group (significant at all time intervals). Colestipol was more effective than clofibrate in lowering the cholesterol fractions associated with increased cardiovascular risk.

(Arch Intern Med 1982;142:721-723)



Author Affiliations

From the Upjohn Co, Kalamazoo, Mich.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 15, 1981.

Reprint requests to the Upjohn Co, Kalamazoo, MI 49001 (Dr Vecchio).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Efficacy and safety of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol-increasing compounds: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Birjmohun et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:185-197.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dietary Administration of Colesevelam Hydrochloride Does Not Affect Fertility or Reproductive Performance in Rats
Marquis et al.
International Journal of Toxicology 2004;23:357-367.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colesevelam Hydrochloride (Cholestagel): A New, Potent Bile Acid Sequestrant Associated With a Low Incidence of Gastrointestinal Side Effects
Davidson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1893-1900.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reducing High Blood Cholesterol Level With Drugs: Cost-effectiveness of Pharmacologic Management
Schulman et al.
JAMA 1990;264:3025-3033.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.