You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 143 No. 6, June 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Value of the Peripheral Blood Smear in Anemic Inpatients

The Laboratory's Reading v a Physician's Reading

Phyllis Jen, MD; Beverly Woo, MD; Paul E. Rosenthal, MD; H. Franklin Bunn, MD; Anita Loscalzo, MS; Lee Goldman, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1983;143(6):1120-1125.


Abstract



• Since physicians are routinely taught to review the peripheral blood smear results of all anemic patients, we analyzed the diagnostic value of the laboratory's blood smear reading and the incremental value of a physician's personal reading in anemic inpatients. Blood smear abnormalities, as reported by the laboratory and two hematologists, were poorly reproducible, with only five of the 11 types of abnormalities being more reproducible than could be expected by chance. The blood smear performed no better than RBC indices in detecting probable iron deficiency or low serum levels of folate or vitamin B12. In anemias not caused by deficiency states, the blood smear reading performed by the hospital laboratory provided unique information in 6% of the cases and helpful information in another 25%, but the additional reading performed by a hematologist never provided unique information and provided incremental helpful information in only 4% of the cases. The peripheral blood smears of all anemic inpatients should be read by the hospital laboratory, but in our hospital, a routine additional personal reading by a physician had limited incremental value and could be reserved for selected cases.

(Arch Intern Med 1983;143:1120-1125)



Author Affiliations



From the Divisions of General Medicine (Drs Jen, Woo, and Goldman) and Hematology (Drs Rosenthal and Bunn) and the Laboratory for the Analysis of Medical Practices (Drs Jen, Woo, and Goldman and Ms Loscalzo) and the Department of Medicine (Drs Jen, Woo, Rosenthal, Bunn, and Goldman, and Ms Loscalzo), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Jan 24, 1983.

Reprint requests to the Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (Dr Goldman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Erythrocyte Anisocytosis: Visual Inspection of Blood Films vs Automated Analysis of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width
Simel et al.
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:822-824.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.