Usefulness of synovial fluid analysis in the evaluation of joint effusions. Use of threshold analysis and likelihood ratios to assess a diagnostic test
J. M. Eisenberg, H. R. Schumacher, P. K. Davidson and L. Kaufmann
This study applied threshold analysis and likelihood ratios to determine
the usefulness of a diagnostic test. Eleven staff rheumatologists or
rheumatology fellows provided probability estimates for the most likely
diagnoses both before and after synovial fluid analyses were performed on
180 patients with joint effusions. They also indicated whether the planned
therapy was altered by the test results. The therapeutic thresholds and log
likelihood ratios were derived for the six most frequent diagnoses.
Synovial fluid analysis was most useful for patients likely to have gout,
pseudogout, or infectious arthritis. The derived therapeutic thresholds
were consistent with recommended medical practice, for example, with a
lower threshold for possible septic arthritis (20%) than for possible gout
(65%). This study demonstrates that threshold analysis and likelihood
ratios can be used to assess the clinical contribution of diagnostic tests.
The value of synovial fluid assays in the diagnosis of joint disease: a literature survey
Swan et al.
Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:493-498.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The utilization of synovial fluid analysis in the UK
Amer et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001;40:1060-1063.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Identification of crystals in synovial fluid
DIEPPE and SWAN
Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:261-263.
FULL TEXT
Effectiveness of the postcoital test: randomised controlled trial
Oei et al.
BMJ 1998;317:502-505.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Testing, Testing, Testing . . .
Putterman and Ben-Chetrit
NEJM 1995;333:1208-1211.
FULL TEXT
You Can Lead a Horse to Water-Improving Physicians' Knowledge of Probabilities May Not Affect Their Decisions
Poses et al.
Med Decis Making 1995;15:65-75.
ABSTRACT
Acute Monoarthritis
Baker and Schumacher
NEJM 1993;329:1013-1020.
FULL TEXT
Eualuating Physicians' Probabilistic Judgments
Poses et al.
Med Decis Making 1988;8:233-240.
ABSTRACT