You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 145 No. 12, December 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Influence of Infarction Site and Size on the Ventricular Response to Coronary Thrombolysis

Gerald C. Timmis, MD; Douglas C. Westveer, MD; Andrew M. Hauser, MD; James R. Stewart, MD; Vellappillil Gangadharan, MD; Renato G. Ramos, MD; Seymour Gordon, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1985;145(12):2188-2193.


Abstract

• To test the hypothesis that myocardial infarction (MI) size rather than location determines the ventricular response to reperfusion, we studied 69 patients receiving intracoronary streptokinase within five hours of chest pain onset who displayed sustained reperfusion at 8.4±3.4 (SD) days. Twenty reperfusion failures served as controls. There were 31 patients with anterior MIs, 18 of which were estimated to be large based on an ejection fraction (EF) at reperfusion of less than 50%; 14 of 38 patients with inferior MIs also had large MIs. The EF increased at follow-up by 6.4%±2.6% in patients with large anterior MIs and by 8.2%±2.5% in those with large inferior MIs; in contrast, it increased by only 1.8%±2.6% in patients with small anterior MIs and significantly decreased by 5.8%±1.9% in patients with small inferior MIs. Six controls with large MIs (four anterior) displayed no change in EF; in 14 with small MIs (ten inferior), it fell slightly. There were no significant group differences in the number of diseased vessels, residual stenosis, or collaterals. It is concluded that MI size, not site, largely determines the ventricular functional response to early reperfusion; thus, patients with inferior MIs cannot be disqualified on this basis alone for thrombolytic therapy.

(Arch Intern Med 1985;145:2188-2193)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (Drs Timmis and Gordon), the Cardiac Laboratories (Dr Timmis), the Electrophysiology Laboratory (Drs Westveer and Stewart), the Noninvasive Laboratory (Dr Hauser), the Coronary Care Unit (Dr Gangadharan), and the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (Dr Ramos), William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Mich; and the Department of Health Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, Mich (Drs Timmis and Gordon).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 13, 1985.

Reprint requests to Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48072 (Dr Timmis).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Outcome of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Who Are Ineligible for Thrombolytic Therapy
Cragg et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1991;115:173-177.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.