You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 145 No. 5, May 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (41)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in Severe Urinary Tract Infection

Carl H. June, MD; Mark D. Browning, MD; L. Patrick Smith, MA; Donald J. Wenzel, MD; Robert S. Pyatt, MD; Leonard M. Checchio, MD; E. S. Amis, Jr, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1985;145(5):841-845.


Abstract

• A prospective study evaluated the utility of renal computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography in 35 patients hospitalized for treatment of urinary tract infection. Renal computed tomograms were abnormal in 18 of 28 patients with acute pyelonephritis and three of four patients with urosepsis, showing findings consistent with pyelonephritis in 17 patients and intrarenal abscess or focal bacterial nephritis in four patients. Renal sonograms were abnormal in only eight patients, showing findings compatible with pyelonephritis in four and intrarenal abscess or focal bacterial nephritis in the other four. Flank tenderness was absent in only four patients with CT findings of pyelonephritis, of whom three were diabetic. We therefore found that (1) renal CT is a sensitive test for acute upper urinary tract infection, (2) ultrasonography detects focal bacterial nephritis and abscesses but is insensitive to uncomplicated upper urinary tract infection, and (3) painless pyelonephritis may be more common in patients with diabetes mellitus.

(Arch Intern Med 1985;145:841-845)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Medicine (Drs June and Browning and Mr Smith), Radiology (Drs Wenzel and Pyatt), and Urology (Dr Amis), Naval Hospital; and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (Drs June, Browning, and Checchio), Bethesda, Md.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 21, 1984.

The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as official nor as reflecting the views of the Department of the Navy nor of the Department of Defense.

Reprint requests to Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, M734, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 (Dr June).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

From the Archives of the AFIP: Pyelonephritis: Radiologic-Pathologic Review
Craig et al.
RadioGraphics 2008;28:255-276.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.