You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 145 No. 6, June 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Multicenter Comparative Trial of Tobramycin and Ticarcillin vs Moxalactam and Ticarcillin in Febrile Neutropenic Patients

Ronald Feld, MD; Thomas J. Louie, MD; Lionel Mandell, MD; Eric J. Bow, MD; Hugh G. Robson, MD; Anthony Chow, MD; Andrew Belch, MD; Lilly Miedzinski, MD; Anita Rachlis, MD; Joseph Pater, MD; Andrew Willan, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1985;145(6):1083-1088.


Abstract

• During a multicenter prospective randomized trial in febrile neutropenic patients (neutrophil count, <1,000/cu mm), 103 episodes were treated with tobramycin sulfate plus ticarcillin disodium (TT) while 117 were treated with moxalactam plus ticarcillin disodium (MT). The majority of patients had an underlying diagnosis of leukemia (60%) and most (62.8%) had granulocyte counts of less than 100/cu mm at the start of therapy. The response rates for clinically or microbiologically documented episodes were 38 of 60 (55.1%) for TT and 38 of 64 (59.4%) for MT. The MT regimen appeared to be more effective for gram-positive infections (56% vs 33%) while TT appeared more effective for gram-negative infections (64% vs 40%). Nephrotoxicity attributable to study drugs occurred in only 2.3% of cases (one on each treatment arm). Prolongation of the prothrombin time was observed in only six of 78 (7.7%) in the TT arm as compared with 39 of 103 (38%) in the MT arm. Neither regimen was adequate for the unusually high frequency of gram-positive pathogens seen during this study.

(Arch Intern Med 1985;145:1083-1088)



Author Affiliations

From the University of Toronto (Drs Feld and Rachlis); University of Manitoba, Winnipeg (Drs Louie and Bow); McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (Dr Mandell); McGill University, Montreal (Dr Robson); University of Vancouver (British Columbia) (Dr Chow); University of Alberta, Edmonton (Drs Belch and Miedzinski); and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario (Drs Pater and Willan).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 12, 1984.

Read in part at the 19th meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, San Diego, May 24, 1983.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Beta-Lactam Antibiotic Therapy in Febrile Granulocytopenic Patients: A Randomized Trial Comparing Cefoperazone plus Piperacillin, Ceftazidime plus Piperacillin, and Imipenem Alone
Winston et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1991;115:849-859.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.