You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 145 No. 6, June 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Correlates of Eosinophiluria

Howard L. Corwin, MD; Stephen M. Korbet, MD; Melvin M. Schwartz, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1985;145(6):1097-1099.


Abstract

• We assessed the clinical correlates of eosinophils in the urine in 65 patients. In 16% of 470 patients whose urine was specifically examined, eosinophils were noted in the urine sediment. Review of the 65 patients with eosinophiluria demonstrated that when eosinophils were expressed as a percentage of total urine white blood cells, 85% (55/65 patients) had less than 5% urine eosinophils and 45% (29/65 patients) had less than 1%. Infection of the upper and lower urinary tract accounted for 45% of the clinical conditions associated with eosinophiluria. In nine (14%) of the 65 patients a diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis could be made by clinical criteria or from renal biopsy specimens. We conclude that the finding of urine eosinophils is associated with a variety of clinical conditions and may be most useful when expressed as a percentage of total white blood cells in the urine. At a low-percentage positive (<5%), it may not be a good predictor of acute interstitial nephritis, but at a higher level (>5%) it may be a more valuable predictor.

(Arch Intern Med 1985;145:1097-1099)



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Drs Corwin and Korbet) and the Department of Pathology (Dr Schwartz), Rush-Presbyterian—St Luke's Medical Center, Chicago.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 4, 1984.

Reprint requests to Section of Nephrology, Rush-Presbyterian—St Luke's Medical Center, 1753 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60612 (Dr Corwin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Renal toxicity of therapeutic drugs
John and Herzenberg
J. Clin. Pathol. 2009;62:505-515.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Eosinophiluria and Acute Interstitial Nephritis
Fletcher
NEJM 2008;358:1760-1761.
FULL TEXT  

Acute interstitial nephritis: clinical features and response to corticosteroid therapy
Clarkson et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:2778-2783.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chemical-Induced Nephropathy: A Review of the Renal Tubulointerstitial Lesions in Humans
Silva
Toxicol Pathol 2004;32:71-84.
ABSTRACT  

Diazepam Labeled Nephrotoxin Based on One Case
Kirschbaum
Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1845-1849.
ABSTRACT  

Nephrotoxicity of Common Drugs Used in Clinical Practice
Cooper and Bennett
Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1213-1218.
ABSTRACT  

Urinary Eosinophils
Sutton
Arch Intern Med 1986;146:2243-2244.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.