You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 146 No. 12, December 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Observer Error in Systolic Blood Pressure Measurement in the Elderly

A Case for Automatic Recorders?

Khin Mae Hla, MD; Kathryn A. Vokaty; John R. Feussner, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(12):2373-2376.


Abstract

• Measurement of systolic blood pressure (BP) in the elderly can be inaccurate due to observer errors such as terminal digit preference and expectation bias. Efforts to reduce these errors include use of trained observers, random-zero sphygmomanometers, and automatic BP recorders. To evaluate the value of an infrasonic recorder, the Infrasonde, we compared simultaneous systolic BP determinations obtained directly by intraarterial measurements, and indirectly by a standard cuffmercury sphygmomanometer using clinic nurses (casual and serial measurements), a trained physician assistant (PA), and the Infrasonde in 36 elderly hypertensive men. All the indirect measurements correlated positively with the direct measurement. A terminal digit preference for zero occurred more frequently in the casual and serial readings compared with the Infrasonde and PA cuff readings: 45% and 51% vs 21% and 22%, respectively. Our data suggest that the Infrasonde is a reliable, alternative device for systolic BP measurement that eliminates observer biases associated



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center (Drs Hla and Feussner); the Ambulatory Care Service (Drs Hla and Feussner and Ms Vokaty), and the Health Services Research Field Program (Drs Hla and Feussner), Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 18, 1986.

Reprint requests to Ambulatory Care Service (11C), Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, 508 Fulton St, Durham, NC 27705 (Dr Hla).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Does This Patient Have Hypertension? How to Measure Blood Pressure
Reeves
JAMA 1995;273:1211-1218.
ABSTRACT  

Screening for Pseudohypertension: A Quantitative, Noninvasive Approach
Hla and Feussner
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:673-676.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.