You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 146 No. 2, February 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REVIEW ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Heroin vs Morphine for Cancer Pain?

Mark N. Levine, MD, MSc, FRCP(C); David L. Sackett, MD, MSc, FRCP(C); Haydn Bush, MD, PhD, FRCP, FRCP(C)

Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(2):353-356.


Abstract

• Narcotic analgesics are the mainstay of pain control in patients with cancer. A controversy has been raging in the United States and Canada as to the legalization of heroin. We have reviewed the literature in order to determine the relative efficacy of heroin and morphine in cancer pain. We applied the following methodologic criteria: (1) Was the assignment of patients to the different opiates randomized? (2) Were all clinically relevant outcomes reported? (3) Were the patients recognizable? (4) Were both clinical and statistical significance considered? (5) Was the opiate regimen feasible in routine clinical practice? (6) Were all patients who entered the study accounted for at its conclusion? Two trials satisfied our first standard. The first, a double-blind cross-over trial, failed to meet standard 4 (the negative conclusion may represent a type 2 error) and only 21% of patients completed both treatment periods. The second study, which compared intramuscular heroin and morphine among patients with postoperative pain, failed to meet standards 3 (patients not described in sufficient detail and only tangentially related to chronic cancer pain) and 4 (type 2 error). Thus the relative efficacy of heroin and morphine in the relief of chronic cancer pain remains unknown. Randomized trials that meet all six methodologic standards must therefore be carried out for this controversy to be resolved.

(Arch Intern Med 1986;146:353-356)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (Drs Levine and Sackett); the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario (Dr Bush); and the Ontario Cancer Foundation Hamilton (Dr Levine) and London (Dr Bush) Regional Treatment Centers, Canada. Dr Levine is a Clinical Trials Scholar of the National Cancer Institute of Canada, and Dr Sackett is a National Health Scientist.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 25, 1985.

Reprint requests to Room 3H7, McMaster University Health Science Center, 1200 Main St W, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5 (Dr Levine).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Converting from oral morphine to subcutaneous diamorphine
Amesbury
Palliat Med 2000;14:165-167.
 

Clinical research on heroin in cancer pain control
Baumrucker
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2000;17:8-9.
 

The Medical Review Article: State of the Science
MULROW
ANN INTERN MED 1987;106:485-488.
ABSTRACT  

Review article : Opioid analgesics in the management of pain in patients with cancer. A review
Hanks and Hoskin
Palliat Med 1987;1:1-25.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.