You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 146 No. 3, March 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Physician Approach to the Recognition and Initial Management of Hypertension

Results of a Statewide Survey of Maryland Physicians

Thomas P. Cloher, MAdmin; Paul K. Whelton, MD, MSc

Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(3):529-533.


Abstract



• A representative sample of Maryland physicians in three practice settings (family/general, internal medicine, and specialty practice) participated in a survey designed to identify their attitudes toward patients with high blood pressure. Respondents recommended initial laboratory investigations more frequently and treatment at lower levels of blood pressure than was the case in a national physician survey performed in 1977. Family/general practitioners were the most cautious in respect to recommending antihypertensive drug therapy. They expressed greater enthusiasm, however, for nonpharmacologic treatment of hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors. Physicians in each of the three practice settings expressed strong support for the use of diuretics as initial drug therapy in patients with mild hypertension. Impediments to long-term care were overwhelmingly believed to be patient-rather than physician-related.

(Arch Intern Med 1986;146:529-533)



Author Affiliations



From the Outpatient Clinical Research Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication June 19, 1985.

Reprint requests to 284 Carnegie, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 (Dr Whelton).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Measuring Adherence to Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension: An Evaluation of the Literature
Milchak et al.
Hypertension 2004;44:602-608.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Self-reported Hypertension Treatment Practices Among Primary Care Physicians: Blood Pressure Thresholds, Drug Choices, and the Role of Guidelines and Evidence-Based Medicine
Hyman and Pavlik
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2281-2286.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hydrochlorothiazide Is Not Additive to Verapamil in Treating Essential Hypertension
Nicholson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1989;149:125-128.
ABSTRACT  

Maximally Reducing Cardiovascular Risk in the Treatment of Hypertension
Kaplan
ANN INTERN MED 1988;109:36-40.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.