You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 146 No. 6, June 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Systolic, Diastolic, and Combined Hypertension

Differences Between Groups

James J. Ferguson III, MD; Otelio S. Randall, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(6):1090-1093.


Abstract



• We used a classification system of systolic, diastolic, and combined (both systolic and diastolic) hypertension to ascertain whether there were significant differences between the groups. The study involved 182 consecutive outpatients for whom no secondary cause of hypertension could be found. There were 96 male and 86 female patients, with a mean age of 45.8 years. There were significant differences in age, with the systolic group being the oldest and the diastolic group the youngest. There were also differences in the prevalence of complications among the categories. Peripheral vascular disease, retinopathy, and coronary artery disease were more prevalent in the systolic and combined groups, while diabetes was more prevalent in the systolic group. We conclude that there appear to be clinical differences between systolic, diastolic, and combined hypertension with respect to presenting characteristics and complications.

(Arch Intern Med 1986;146:1090-1093)



Author Affiliations



From the Division of Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor. Dr Ferguson is now with Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, and Dr Randall is now with Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Sept 3, 1985.

Reprint requests to Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Hospital, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 (Dr Ferguson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Four Blood Pressure Indexes and the Risk of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Japanese Men and Women: A Meta-Analysis of 16 Cohort Studies
Miura et al.
Circulation 2009;119:1892-1898.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Four Blood Pressure Indexes for the Prediction of 10-Year Stroke Risk in Middle-Aged and Older Asians
Miura et al.
Hypertension 2004;44:715-720.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pulse Pressure Compared With Other Blood Pressure Indexes in the Prediction of 25-Year Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality Rates: The Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry Study
Miura et al.
Hypertension 2001;38:232-237.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.