You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 146 No. 6, June 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comprehensive Immunization Delivery in Conjunction With Influenza Vaccination

CPT John D. Grabenstein, MS, RPh, USA; Laurie J. Smith, MD; Doris W. Carter, RN; MAJ Renata J. Engler, MC, USA; COL Richard Evans III, MC, USA; COL Richard J. Summers, MC, USA

Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(6):1189-1192.


Abstract

• All patients and employees presenting for influenza A and B vaccination were studied for the need for other immunizations or tests, based on criteria of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee. More than 72% of patients and employees needed at least one other vaccine or test. During a 41/2-month period, 1,353 doses of influenza virus vaccine, bivalent, types A and B, were prescribed. Health care providers ordered doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (adult) for 36.8% of these recipients, pneumococcal vaccine, polyvalent 23, for 42.1%, and a tuberculin skin test for 36.3%. Determinations of hepatitis B titers or hepatitis B vaccine doses were ordered for 140 individuals. Patients older than 60 years needed additional immunizations with greater frequency. Rates of delayed adverse reactions (35.9%) and subsequent self-medication (11.7%) were recorded. The systemic adverse reaction rate was 17.3%. Annual influenza vaccination programs are valuable public health opportunities to determine immunizations needed



Author Affiliations

From the Allergy—Clinical Immunology Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 10, 1985.

Presented in part as a scientific exhibition at the 41st Congress of the American College of Allergists, Bal Harbour, Fla, Feb 3, 1985.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

Reprint requests to Allergy—Clinical Immunology Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5001 (Mr Grabenstein).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Tetanus in the Elderly-Reply
Richardson and Knight
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:1727-1727.
ABSTRACT  

The Prevention of Tetanus in the Elderly
Richardson and Knight
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:1712-1717.
ABSTRACT  

Immunization Policies and Vaccine Coverage Among Adults: The Risk for Missed Opportunities
WILLIAMS et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1988;108:616-625.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.