You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 146 No. 8, August 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Systematic Esophageal Evaluation of Patients With Noncardiac Chest Pain

Sarkis J. Chobanian, MD; Stanley B. Benjamin, MD; David J. Curtis, MD; Edward L. Cattau, Jr, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(8):1505-1508.


Abstract

• We prospectively studied 73 patients with anginalike chest pain severe enough to warrant admission to a coronary care unit over a five-month period. Thirty-four patients (47%) were found to have coronary artery disease as the cause of their symptoms, based on exercise testing, stress radionuclide imaging, or cardiac catheterization. The remaining 39 patients had normal cardiac findings and then underwent videoesophagography, radionuclide esophageal transit study, and esophageal manometry. Thirty-three of the 39 underwent acid perfusion testing (modified Bernstein's test). The findings at esophageal manometry were abnormal in 29 (74%) of 39. Manometric diagnoses were "nutcracker esophagus" in 17 (59%), nonspecific esophageal motility disorders in nine (31%), diffuse esophageal spasm in two (7%), and achalasia in one (3%). Bernstein's test reproduced symptoms in only 12%. The sensitivity of videoesophagography in detecting esophageal motility disorders was 66%, and that of radionuclide esophageal transit was 79%. The positive predictive values were 86% and 85%, respectively.

(Arch Intern Med 1986;146:1505-1508)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Medicine (Drs Chobanian, Benjamin, and Cattau) and Radiology (Dr Curtis), Naval Hospital, and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md. Drs Benjamin and Cattau are now with the Department of Gastroenterology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, and Dr Curtis is now with the Department of Radiology, George Washington University Hospital.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 1, 1985.

Read before the 84th Annual Meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, Washington, DC, May 24, 1983.

The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private ones of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of Defense, the Department of the Navy, or the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.

Reprint requests to Box 342, Naval Hospital, Bethesda, MD 20814-5011 (Dr Chobanian).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Are oesophageal disorders a common cause of chest pain despite normal coronary anatomy?
Wu et al.
QJM 2000;93:543-550.
FULL TEXT  

Questioning the Value of Esophageal Motility Testing in Chest Pain of Noncardiac Origin
Engel and Lawrence
Arch Intern Med 1987;147:212-212.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.