You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 146 No. 9, September 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (29)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Medical and Economic Considerations in Using a New Contrast Medium

Harry W. Fischer, MD; Robert F. Spataro, MD; Paul M. Rosenberg, JD

Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(9):1717-1721.


Abstract

• In deciding to use a new intravascular contrast medium, the considerations should be patient safety, imaging efficacy, and cost. Balancing these factors, use can be estimated. With the new low-osmolality contrast media, particularly the nonionic media, the expected increased patient safety must be balanced against the much higher cost.

(Arch Intern Med 1986;146:1717-1721)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Radiology (Drs Fischer and Spataro), University of Rochester (NY) School of Medicine and Dentistry; and the Departments of Radiology (Drs Fischer and Spataro) and Legal Affairs and Risk Management (Mr Rosenberg), Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 30, 1986.

Reprint requests to the Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642 (Dr Fischer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

'Rationing' Health Care: Not All Definitions Are Created Equal
Ubel and Goold
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:209-214.
FULL TEXT  

Water-Soluble Radiographic Contrast Media: Ionic vs. Nonionic
Redman and Miller
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1990;3:45-55.
 

Intravenous Pyelography: The Case against Its Routine Use
Mushlin and Thornbury
ANN INTERN MED 1989;111:58-70.
ABSTRACT  

The Introduction of Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents in Radiology: Medical, Economic, Legal, and Public Policy Issues
Jacobson and Rosenquist
JAMA 1988;260:1586-1592.
ABSTRACT  

Cost vs Safety The Use of Low-Osmolar Contrast Media
Fischer
JAMA 1988;260:1614-1614.
ABSTRACT  

Allergic Reactions to Drugs and Biologic Agents
Anderson and Adkinson
JAMA 1987;258:2891-2899.
ABSTRACT  

New Intravascular Contrast Material
Thompson
Arch Intern Med 1986;146:1688-1688.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.