You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 1, January 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (59)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Lipid-Soluble and Water-Soluble β-Blockers

Comparison of the Central Nervous System Depressant Effect

Francis M. Gengo, PharmD; Larry Huntoon, MD, PhD; William B. McHugh, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(1):39-43.


Abstract



• The sedative effects of a relatively lipid-soluble and a water-soluble β-blocker were compared in 20 male hypertensives, 30 to 60 years old. In a blinded, randomized, crossover study, critical flash fusion frequency and computerized Stroop Word Test were used to assess psychomotor function parameters during a drug-free control day and then following 14 days of either metoprolol, 150 mg daily, or atenolol, 100 mg daily, treatment. Both drugs caused subtle but significant reductions in both parameters of sedation (critical flash fusion frequency and computerized Stroop Word Testing). Sedation was significantly related to serum concentrations of both drugs. The maximum drug-induced change was 17.2%± 9% for metoprolol and 19.6%±3% for atenolol. The duration of effect was six hours after atenolol and two hours after metoprolol. Blood pressure control for all patients was similar during both treatment phases. These results demonstrate that relative lipid solubility does not reliably predict the neurologic effects of β-blockers. The intensity of drug-induced sedation was similar, but the water-soluble agent produced a longer duration of sedative activity.

(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:39-43)



Author Affiliations



From the Division of Neuropharmacology, Dent Neurologic Institute (Drs Gengo and Huntoon), Department of Neurology (Drs Gengo, Huntoon, and McHugh), Millard Fillmore Hospital, Buffalo, and the School of Pharmacy and Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo (Dr Gengo).


Footnotes



Accepted for publication May 2, 1986.

Read before the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Dallas, April 30, 1985.

Reprint requests to Division of Neuropharmacology, Dent Neurologic Institute, Millard Fillmore Hospital, 3 Gates Circle, Buffalo, NY 14209 (Dr Gengo).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Increased Prescribing of Antidepressants Subsequent to {beta}-Blocker Therapy
Thiessen et al.
Arch Intern Med 1990;150:2286-2290.
ABSTRACT  

Neuropsychological Side Effects of {beta}-Blockers
Dimsdale and Newton
Arch Intern Med 1989;149:514-525.
ABSTRACT  

The Effect of {beta}-Blockers on Mental Performance on Older Hypertensive Patients
Gengo et al.
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:779-784.
ABSTRACT  

Central Nervous System Side Effects With {beta}-Blockers
Burris
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:980-980.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.