You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 10, October 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Medical Therapy for Chronic Reflux Esophagitis

Long-term Follow-up

David A. Lieberman, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(10):1717-1720.


Abstract

• The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the long-term course of medically treated severe reflux esophagitis to determine if prolonged pharmacologic therapy was necessary to control symptoms. Twenty patients with chronic reflux esophagitis (mean duration, 13 years) achieved significant clinical improvement after acute intensive therapy with cimetidine and metoclopramide. During the 26-month follow-up period after remission, nine (45%) patients experienced a relapse of symptoms as drug dosages were tapered or discontinued, eight (40%) patients remained in remission, and three experienced a relapse of symptoms after a remission of longer than two years. Lower esophageal sphincter pressures were lower among patients who relapsed compared with patients with prolonged remission (4.9 vs 13.2 mm Hg). Drug requirements to maintain symptom control were antacids alone in five patients, bedtime H2-blocker in five, full-dose H2-blocker in four, and bedtime metoclopramide (10 mg) plus an H2-blocker in six. Moreover, the symptoms of three patients receiving full-dose H2-blocker therapy were controlled with antacids alone for two years, until relapse occurred. In conclusion, some patients with severe, long-standing reflux esophagitis will have a lasting response to short-term intensive medical therapy. Long-term intensive therapy may be unnecessary in many patients. Patients with lower sphincter pressures may have a higher likelihood of symptomatic relapse.

(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1717-1720)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Portland (Ore) Veterans Administration Medical Center and Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 16, 1987.

Presented in part at the World Congress of Gastroenterology, São Paulo, Brazil, Sept 8, 1986.

Reprint requests to Portland Veterans Administration Medical Center, PO Box 1034, Portland, OR 97207 (Dr Lieberman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Health Care Utilization After Medical and Surgical Therapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Population-Based Study, 1996 to 2000
Khaitan et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:1356-1361.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Associations between different forms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
El-Serag and Sonnenberg
Gut 1997;41:594-599.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in a Managed Care Environment: A Surgeon's Response
Crookes and DeMeester
Arch Surg 1996;131:1021-1023.
ABSTRACT  

The Role of a Defective Lower Esophageal Sphincter in the Clinical Outcome of Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Costantini et al.
Arch Surg 1996;131:655-659.
ABSTRACT  

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Current Strategies for Patient Management
Castell and Johnston
Arch Fam Med 1996;5:221-227.
ABSTRACT  

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in a Managed Care Environment: Suggested Disease Management Guidelines
Fennerty et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:477-484.
ABSTRACT  

Physiology of the Antireflux Barrier and Diagnostic Tests of Foregut Function
Crookes et al.
SURG INNOV 1995;2:10-26.
ABSTRACT  

Indications, Principles of Procedure Selection, and Technique of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication
Peters and DeMeester
SURG INNOV 1995;2:27-44.
ABSTRACT  

Current Trends in the Pharmacotherapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Hixson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:717-723.
ABSTRACT  

Rationale and Efficacy of Conservative Therapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Kitchin and Castell
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:448-454.
ABSTRACT  

The Significance of the Gastric Secretory State in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Barlow et al.
Arch Surg 1989;124:937-940.
ABSTRACT  

Long-term Therapy for Chronic Gastroesophageal Reflux
Castell
Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1701-1702.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.