You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 10, October 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Multicenter Comparative Trial of Three-Day Norfloxacin vs Ten-Day Sulfamethoxazole and Trimethoprim for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections

Gary E. Stein, PharmD; Nancy Mummaw; Ellie J. C. Goldstein, MD; Edward J. Boyko, MD; L. Barth Reller, MD; Terrance O. Kurtz, DO; Kenneth Miller, MD; Clair E. Cox, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(10):1760-1762.


Abstract

• Two-hundred nine patients with symptoms of acute urinary tract infection and pyuria were randomized to 400 mg of administered norfloxacin twice daily for three days, or 800 mg of sulfamethoxazole and 160 mg of trimethoprim administered twice daily for ten days. Therapeutic outcome was assessed five to nine days and four to six weeks after treatment. The cure rates were 71/74 (96%) with norfloxacin and 81/81 (100%) with sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim five to nine days after treatment. Only seven patients had a recurrence at the second follow-up visit; four in the norfloxacin group and three in the sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim group. No isolates were resistant to norfloxacin, but three Escherichia coli were resistant to sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim. Fifteen patients in each group reported a side effect during treatment. Two patients in the norfloxacin group and four patients in the sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim group discontinued therapy due to an adverse effect. In this multicenter study, a three-day course of norfloxacin was as effective and safe as a ten-day regimen of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim in the treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections.

(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1760-1762)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing (Dr Stein and Ms Mummaw); the R. M. Alden Research Laboratory, Los Angeles (Dr Goldstein); the Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver (Drs Boyko and Reller); the Associated Medical Clinic, Des Moines (Dr Kurtz); the Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Ill (Dr Miller); and the Department of Urology, University of Tennessee, Memphis (Dr Cox).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 23, 1987.

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine, B220 Life Sciences Bldg, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 (Dr Stein).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Single-Dose Compared With 3-Day Norfloxacin Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Women
Saginur et al.
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:1233-1237.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.