You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 10, October 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Patients Who Refuse Treatment in Medical Offices

Julia E. Connelly, MD; Courtney Campbell, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(10):1829-1833.


Abstract

• Five hundred sixty-two consecutive patient visits to a medical office were prospectively evaluated for the presence of ethical problems. During 23 (4.0%) visits, patients refused recommended medical intervention. Refusal was defined as the rejection of preventive health measures, diagnostic evaluation, hospitalization, and other office procedures. Preventive health measures, vaccinations, and cancer screening were the most common types of intervention refused (n =10). Diagnostic studies, such as roentgenograms, biopsies, and cardiac stress testing were also commonly refused (n =9). The reasons for the refusal included psychologic factors, such as fear and anxiety, previous "bad" experiences with the recommended intervention, distrust of physicians, and problems of communication. Fourteen patients suffered no major consequences from their refusal, five of whom were seen twice during the study. Five patients had a delayed diagnosis and one patient died of a myocardial infarction after refusing hospitalization for unstable angina.

(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1829-1833)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Medicine (Dr Connelly) and the Department of Religious Studies (Dr Campbell), the University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 12, 1987.

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine, Box 494, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (Dr Connelly).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

What Are We Teaching About Indigent Patients?
Miles
JAMA 1992;268:2561-2562.
ABSTRACT  

Ethics Consultations Masking Economic Dilemmas in Patient Care
Schiedermayer et al.
Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1303-1305.
ABSTRACT  

Ethical Problems in the Medical Office
Connelly and Dalle-Mura
JAMA 1988;260:812-815.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.