You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 11, November 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Diagnostic Value of the Medical History

Perceptions of Internal Medicine Physicians

Eugene C. Rich, MD; Terry W. Crowson, MD; Ilene B. Harris, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(11):1957-1960.


Abstract



• We investigated the perceptions of 71 internal medicine faculty and residents regarding the diagnostic value of the medical history and other attitudes toward the medical interview. Physicians perceive the medical history as having much higher value in diagnosis than either the physical examination or laboratory/radiography information (mean scores, 5.76, 2.41, and 2.49, respectively). The perceptions of the importance of the physician-patient relationship were significantly correlated with the diagnostic value of the history. There was also a strong relationship between the perceived value of the history and preferences for more skilled interviewing responses, as measured by the Helping Relationship Inventory. Contrary to expectations, the perceptions of residents toward the diagnostic value of the patient's history increased significantly over the course of training (5.00 to 6.00). We conclude that despite the increasing emphasis on diagnostic technology, internal medicine residents and faculty continue to view the patient's history as the preeminent source of diagnostic information. Physician attitudes toward the physician-patient relationship and toward the medical interview may contribute to the diagnostic value of the history.

(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1957-1960)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Medicine, St Paul-Ramsey Medical Center/ Ramsey Clinic and University of Minnesota Medical School, St Paul.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Aug 7, 1987.

Presented in part at the "Research in Medical Education" meeting of the Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC, Oct 30, 1985.

Reprint requests to St Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, 640 Jackson St, St Paul, MN 55101 (Dr Rich).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Do opiates affect the clinical evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain?
Ranji et al.
JAMA 2006;296:1764-1774.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Asthma in Life Context: Video Intervention/Prevention Assessment (VIA)
Rich et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:469-477.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing Medical Interview Performance: Effect of Interns' Gender and Month of Training
Meuleman and Harward
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:1677-1680.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnostic Value of the Medical History
Platt
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:984-985.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.