You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 12, December 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (34)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Study of Patient Acceptance of Double-Contrast Barium Enema and Colonoscopy

Which Procedure Is Preferred by Patients?

Michael M. Van Ness, MD; Sarkis J. Chobanian, MD; Charles Winters, Jr, MD; Anna Mae Diehl, MD; Regina L. Esposito; Edward L. Cattau, Jr, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(12):2175-2176.


Abstract

• To our knowledge, no previous study has addressed the question of which method of evaluation of the lower gastrointestinal tract is preferred by patients, air-contrast barium enema or colonoscopy. Over a four-month period, we asked 189 consecutive patients who had undergone colonoscopy to express their preference for either air-contrast barium enema or colonoscopy. A clear preference for colonoscopy was expressed by our patients in terms of comfort and polyp detection despite higher cost. Time lost from work and post-procedure constipation were significantly less for colonoscopy than for barium enema. These factors should be considered in the evaluation of suspected lower gastrointestinal tract disease.

(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:2175-2176)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Division, Naval Hospital, and Digestive Diseases Division, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md. Dr Winters is now in private practice in Madison, Tenn, and Dr Cattau is now with the Gastroenterology Division, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 8,1987.

The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private ones of the authors and are not to be construed as official policy or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Navy or the Department of Defense.

Reprint requests to Box 301, Naval Hospital, Bethesda, MD 20814-5011 (Dr Van Ness).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Acceptance by Patients of Multidetector CT Colonography Compared with Barium Enema Examinations, Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, and Colonoscopy
Taylor et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003;181:913-921.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colonic Masses: Detection with MR Colonography
Luboldt et al.
Radiology 2000;216:383-388.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Review of the Issues and a Comparison with Other Screening Alternatives
Glick
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000;174:1529-1537.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.