You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 3, March 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Thoracic Computed Tomography in the Preoperative Evaluation of Primary Bronchogenic Carcinoma

COL Joseph I. Matthews, MC, USA; MAJ Harvey M. Richey, MC, USA; COL Robert A. Helsel, MC, USA; LTC Brent A. Grishkin, MC, USA

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(3):449-453.


Abstract

• One hundred seventy-four patients with bronchogenic carcinoma underwent computed tomography (CT) as part of their preoperative evaluation. Overall, CT had a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 78%, and an accuracy of 81% in identifying mediastinal lymph node metastases. In patientswith a central tumor, the sensitivity was 93%, the specificity 74%, and the accuracy 83%. In patients with a peripheral tumor, the respective percentages were 55%, 82%, and 77%. Only 11 of 66 patients with a peripheral tumor had mediastinal metastases, and five of these patients had a normal CT scan. Conversely, 43 of 64 patients with a central tumor and mediastinal lymph node enlargement on the CT scan had unresectable disease, compared with only one of 44 patients without such enlargement. We conclude that CT is not useful in the evaluation of patients with a peripheral tumor; however, it is useful in determining which patients with a central tumor do not require a surgical staging procedure prior to thoracotomy.

(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:449-453)



Author Affiliations

From the Pulmonary Disease Service, Department of Medicine (Drs Matthews and Richey), and the Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery (Drs Helsel andd Grishkin), Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Tex.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 28, 1986.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

Reprint requests to Pulmonary Disease Service, Box 446, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6200 (Dr Matthews).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

PET, CT, and MRI with Combidex for mediastinal staging in non-small cell lung carcinoma
Kernstine et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999;68:1022-1028.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Impact of Thoracic Computed Tomography in Clinically Staged T1, NO, MO Chest Lesions
Becker et al.
Arch Intern Med 1990;150:557-559.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.