 |
 |

Blocking of Iron Absorption by a Preliminary Oral Dose of Iron
Mary A. O'Neil-Cutting, SM;
William H. Crosby, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(3):489-491.
Abstract
Using a small-dose iron tolerance test (ITT) in mildly irondeficient healthy adults, we have examined the phenomenon of mucosal block. First proposed and demonstrated by Hahn et al with radioiron, "mucosal block" describes diminished avidity for iron of the intestinal mucosa following an orally administered blocking dose. In the ITT, the index of absorption is an increase in plasma iron concentration, rather than retained radioactivity. The absorption of a blocked 10-mg test dose of iron was compared with that of a 10-mg control dose given to the same subject. Both 60- and 30-mg blocking doses of iron resulted in diminished absorption of the test dose. The refractory state of the intestine lasted as long as 24 hours.
(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:489-491)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Hematology, Division of Medicine, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC. Dr Crosby is presently with the Chapman Regional Cancer Center, Joplin, Mo.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication May 16, 1986.
Reprint requests to Chapman Regional Cancer Center, PO Box 2644, Joplin, MO 64803 (Dr Crosby).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Iron absorption in breast-fed infants: effects of age, iron status, iron supplements, and complementary foods
Domellof et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002;76:198-204.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Iron homeostasis: new tales from the crypt
Roy and Enns
Blood 2000;96:4020-4027.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Daily Iron Supplementation Is More Effective than Twice Weekly Iron Supplementation in Pregnant Women in Pakistan in a Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial
Mumtaz et al.
J. Nutr. 2000;130:2697-2702.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effect of iron-, iodine-, and ß-carotene–fortified biscuits on the micronutrient status of primary school children: a randomized controlled trial
van Stuijvenberg et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999;69:497-503.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|