You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 3, March 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Noninvasive Venous Examinations as a Screening Test for Pulmonary Embolism

Mark J. Schiff, MD; Arthur W. Feinberg, MD; James B. Naidich, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(3):505-507.


Abstract

• Blood clots that cause pulmonary embolism are reputed to arise in the lower extremities in 95% of cases and, therefore, testing with noninvasive venous studies has been recommended as a screening method. We evaluated plethysmography results and Doppler venous flow sounds for their concordance with pulmonary angiograms in a group of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, and for their concordance with venograms in a second group of patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis. Fifty patients had both pulmonary angiograms and noninvasive venous studies. Of 16 patients with positive noninvasive studies, ten had angiograms positive for pulmonary embolism, and six had negative angiograms. Of 34 patients with negative noninvasive studies, 16 had positive pulmonary angiograms and 18 had negative angiograms. The positive predictive value was 63% and the negative predictive value was 53%. By contrast, in 125 patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis, the positive and negative predictive values of noninvasive studies were 94% and 92%, respectively. In this retrospective study, positive noninvasive examinations were useful clinically, but noninvasive venous studies were frequently negative in patients with documented pulmonary embolism and cannot be used to exclude this diagnosis.

(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:505-507)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Medicine (Drs Schiff and Feinberg) and Radiology (Dr Naidich), North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY, and Cornell University Medical College, New York (Drs Schiff, Feinberg, and Naidich).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 24, 1986.

Reprint requests to the Department of Medicine, North Shore University Hospital, 300 Community Dr, Manhasset, NY 11030 (Dr Schiff).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Outcomes After Withholding Anticoagulation From Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Negative Computed Tomographic Findings: A Cohort Study
Swensen et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:130-138.
ABSTRACT  

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Various Strategies in the Diagnostic Management of Pulmonary Embolism
Oudkerk et al.
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:947-954.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.