You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 5, May 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (54)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Initial Electrocardiogram During Admission for Myocardial Infarction

Use as a Predictor of Clinical Course and Facility Utilization

Capt Mark E. Stark, MC, USAF; James L. Vacek, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(5):843-846.


Abstract

• The first electrocardiogram obtained on presentation for suspected myocardial infarction was examined for its usefulness in predicting clinical course and facility use. We studied 221 patients consecutively admitted to a nonuniversity hospital coronary care unit. High-risk patients were identified if the electrocardiographic diagnoses included myocardial infarction, ischemia, left ventricular hypertrophy, left bundle-branch block, or paced rhythm. These 63 patients (29% of total) had significantly greater incidences of serious events, need for procedures, and death than low-risk patients whose initial electrocardiograms did not carry the above diagnoses. Patients with a low-risk initial electrocardiogram may not require the facilities of a coronary care unit and perhaps could be safely observed in an intermediate care area. However, many hospitals do not have an intermediate care facility available, and in those that do, daily costs may not be markedly different than for treatment in a coronary care unit. Whether these low-risk patients could be safely treated in general medicine beds, where potential cost savings would be much greater, is unknown.

(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:843-846)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, US Air Force Medical Center, Keesler AFB, Biloxi, Miss (Dr Stark); and the Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (Dr Vacek).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 24, 1986.

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Kansas Medical Center, 39th Street and Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66103 (Dr Vacek).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Task force on the management of chest pain
Erhardt et al.
Eur Heart J 2002;23:1153-1176.
FULL TEXT  

Is Telemetry Monitoring Necessary in Low-Risk Suspected Acute Chest Pain Syndromes?*
Snider et al.
Chest 2002;122:517-523.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

First ECG in chest pain
Speake and Terry
Emerg. Med. J. 2001;18:61--62.
FULL TEXT  

Prognostic significance of ST segment depression in lateral leads I, aVL, V5 and V6 on the admission electrocardiogram in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation
Barrabes et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1813-1819.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chest pain with nondiagnostic electrocardiogram in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial of two cardiac marker regimens
CMAJ 2000;162:1561-1566.
 

Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Ischemic Syndromes With and Without ST-Segment Elevation
Holmes et al.
Circulation 1999;100:2067-2073.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Value of the Admission Electrocardiogram in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Savonitto et al.
JAMA 1999;281:707-713.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiac troponin I as a predictor of major cardiac events in emergency department patients with acute chest pain
Polanczyk et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:8-14.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prediction of the Need for Intensive Care in Patients Who Come to Emergency Departments with Acute Chest Pain
Goldman et al.
NEJM 1996;334:1498-1504.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of a Rapid Assay of Subforms of Creatine Kinase MB to Diagnose or Rule Out Acute Myocardial Infarction
Puleo et al.
NEJM 1994;331:561-566.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early "Step-Down" Transfer of Low-Risk Patients with Chest Pain: A Controlled Interventional Trial
Weingarten et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1990;113:283-289.
ABSTRACT  

Statistical Medicine-Reply
FESMIRE et al.
Arch Intern Med 1990;150:921-921.
ABSTRACT  

Risk Stratification According to the Initial Electrocardiogram in Patients With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction
Fesmire et al.
Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1294-1297.
ABSTRACT  

The Coronary Care Unit Turns 25: Historical Trends and Future Directions
LEE and GOLDMAN
ANN INTERN MED 1988;108:887-894.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.