 |
 |

Utility of Technetium Tc 99m Pyrophosphate Bone Scanning in Cardiac Amyloidosis
Morie A. Gertz, MD;
Manuel L. Brown, MD;
Mary F. Hauser, MD;
Robert A. Kyle, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(6):1039-1044.
Abstract
 |  |
Thirty-four patients with amyloidosis proved by biopsy specimen were studied using technetium Tc 99m pyrophosphate scintigraphy to assess its utility in the diagnosis of amyloid heart involvement. Of 14 patients studied retrospectively, only three had intense uptake judged to be diagnostic of cardiac amyloidosis. In a prospective analysis of 20 patients with amyloidosis, all of whom had evidence of cardiac involvement by two-dimensional echocardiography, 17 had abnormal scans. Fourteen of the 17 scans had only 1+ or 2+ uptake, a finding that also was present in 15 of the 20 control patients (without amyloid heart disease). Only three of the 20 patients with cardiac amyloidosis had intense uptake that was considered unequivocal and diagnostic of amyloidosis. Of the five patients with biopsy specimen proof of endomyocardial amyloidosis, only one had intense uptake and one had no uptake. When intense uptake of technetium Tc 99m pyrophosphate is found in the heart of a patient, amyloidosis is highly likely. The technique, however, is not sufficiently sensitive to warrant routine screening of patients with amyloidosis or cardiomyopathies. Cross-sectional echocardiography is superior to pyrophosphate scintigraphy for recognition of cardiac amyloidosis.
(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1039-1044)
Author Affiliations
From the Division of Hematology and Internal Medicine (Drs Gertz and Kyle) and the Section of Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine (Drs Brown and Hauser), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Dec 10, 1986.
Reprint requests to Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (Dr Gertz).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Amyloidosis and the heart: a comprehensive review.
Shah et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1805-1813.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|