You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 7, July 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Modeling Decisions to Use Tube Feeding in Seriously Ill Patients

David G. Smith, MD; Robert S. Wigton, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(7):1242-1245.


Abstract

• Clinical decisions to use life-sustaining technologies, such as tube feeding in seriously ill patients, depend on many important factors. Using case simulations, we analyzed the decisions of students, housestaff, and faculty of Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, to use tube feeding in seriously ill patients. Although patient preference was the most important factor for most respondents, we observed three different patterns of decision strategies. Those in the first group, the autonomists (34% of respondents), considered only patient preference; those in the second group, the mixed strategists (56% of respondents), included patient preference among other important factors; and those in the third group, the paternalists (10% of respondents), used factors other than patient preference. More experienced clinicians and those individuals who believed tube feeding represented an extraordinary level of care were significantly less likely to begin tube feeding in the case simulations. Description of these individual decision strategies and elucidation of the important physician characteristics can help identify the potential ethical dilemmas in these different clinical decisions.

(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1242-1245)



Author Affiliations

From the Sections of General Internal Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia (Dr Smith), and the University of Nebraska College of Medicine, Omaha (Dr Wigton).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 7, 1987.

Reprint requests to Temple University Hospital, 3401 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19140 (Dr Smith).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dentists' Judgment Strategies on Prophylactic Removal of Mandibular Third Molars
Knutsson et al.
JDR 2000;79:1989-1995.
ABSTRACT  

Variability in Physician Opinion on Limiting Pediatric Life Support
Randolph et al.
Pediatrics 1999;103:46e-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiologists' Use of Clinical Information for Management Decisions for Patients with Unstable Angina:: A Policy Analysis
Van Miltenburg-Van Zijl et al.
Med Decis Making 1997;17:292-297.
ABSTRACT  

Ethics Consultants' Recommendations for Life-Prolonging Treatment of Patients in a Persistent Vegetative State
Fox and Stocking
JAMA 1993;270:2578-2582.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of the Benefits of Gastric Tube Feeding in an Elderly Population
Weaver et al.
Arch Fam Med 1993;2:953-956.
ABSTRACT  

Use of Linear Models to Analyze Physicians' Decisions
Wigton
Med Decis Making 1988;8:241-252.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.