You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 7, July 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Model for Physicians' Therapeutic Decision Making

Carol A. Mancuso, MD; David N. Rose, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(7):1281-1285.


Abstract

• We explored physician's cognitive processes when making therapeutic decisions in a complex situation in which more than one treatment option is acceptable. Eighteen internists were presented with three hypothetical cases of patients with coronary artery disease and were asked to explain their treatment decisions. Based on process tracing, we characterized their method of therapeutic decision making. We found that physicians use a three-stage process that we call focal composite analysis: (1) selection of a few facts (focal points) and evaluation of each fact individually with respect to treatment options; (2) reassessment of the value of the focal points with respect to each other and unification of the case; and (3) summation of the values of the focal points to make the final decision. Using this model, we predicted physicians' actual treatment decisions in 96% of the hypothetical cases. Further analysis revealed a wide variety of focal points chosen overall, with most physicians choosing different focal points in each case. Of a total of 32 focal points chosen in three cases, only two focal points were predictors of the physicians' actual treatment choices. We conclude that in the complex problem considered here physicians use a staged process of choosing and evaluating information to make therapeutic choices.

(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1281-1285)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Community Medicine and Medicine, Mt Sinai School of Medicine, City University of New York. Dr Mancuso is now with the Department of Medicine, New York Hospital.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 7, 1987.

Reprint requests to Mt Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave L. Levy P1, New York, NY 10029 (Dr Rose).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Factors that Influence Prescribing Decisions
Schumock et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2004;38:557-562.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Scope and nature of prescribing decisions made by general practitioners
Denig et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:137-143.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differences in the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction in the United States and Canada: A Comparison of Two University Hospitals
Pilote et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1090-1096.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of Physician Decision Making With the Use of Prior Probabilities and a Decision-Analysis Model
Carter et al.
Arch Fam Med 1993;2:529-534.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.