You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 148 No. 11, November 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The 'Do Not Resuscitate' Order

A Profile of Its Changing Use

Palmi V. Jonsson, MD; Michael McNamee, MD; Edward W. Campion, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(11):2373-2375.


Abstract

• The "do not resuscitate" (DNR) order has wide-ranging ethical, legal, and economic implications. We reviewed the course of 244 patients who died during two three-month periods, in 1982 and 1986. We found that 68% of patients who died had a DNR order written, including 94% with malignancy and half of patients with cardiovascular disease. Most orders (61%) were written within three days of death, with 64% written on medical-surgical floors and 34% in critical care units. Even among patients under the age of 60 years, 57% had a DNR order written by the time of death. Ninety-one percent of DNR orders were written by attending physicians, with accompanying explanatory note in 84%. Documentation showed only 14% of patients but 77% of families being consulted. In 1983 a new two-level DNR order system defined two levels of intensity: "all but cardiopulmonary resuscitation" and "comfort measures only." Equal numbers of patients received each order in the 1986 sample. No patient was transferred to the critical care units after a DNR order had been written. The prevalence of DNR orders written for patients dying of cardiovascular disease increased from 27% to 64% over the four years. We conclude, from study of deaths in this representative community hospital, that an explicit DNR order is now the rule rather than the exception, but decisions are made late and involve family far more than the patient.

(Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2373-2375)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Internal Medicine, New Britain (Conn) General Hospital, a University of Connecticut teaching hospital (Drs Jonsson and McNamee), the Geriatrics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital (Dr Campion), and the Division on Aging, Harvard Medical School (Drs Jonsson and Campion), Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 30, 1988.

Reprint requests to Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for the Aged, 1200 Center St, Roslindale, MA 02131 (Dr Jonsson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
Morrell et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:642-647.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Changes in Forgoing Life-Sustaining Treatment in Israeli ICU Patients
Jakobson et al.
Chest 2004;126:1969-1973.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

End of life decisions: attitudes of Finnish physicians
Hilden et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2004;30:362-365.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan
Tokuda et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2004;30:264-267.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Worcester Heart Attack Study
Jackson et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:776-783.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Religiosity on Patients' Perceptions of Do-Not-Resuscitate Status
Sullivan et al.
Psychosomatics 2004;45:119-128.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Finnish Nurses' Views on End-of-Life Discussions and a Comparison with Physicians' Views
Hilden et al.
Nurs Ethics 2004;11:165-178.
ABSTRACT  

Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
Cherniack
J. Med. Ethics 2002;28:303-307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The decision making process regarding the withdrawal or withholding of potential life-saving treatments in a children's hospital
Street et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2000;26:346-352.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Communicating Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders With a Computer-Based System
Heffner et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1090-1095.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Not for Resuscitation: two decades of challenge for nursing ethics and practice
Schultz
Nurs Ethics 1997;4:227-238.
ABSTRACT  

Epidemiology of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: Disparity by Age, Diagnosis, Gender, Race, and Functional Impairment
Wenger et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2056-2062.
ABSTRACT  

Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders at a Teaching Hospital in Japan
Fukaura et al.
NEJM 1995;333:805-808.
FULL TEXT  

Use of the Medical Futility Rationale in Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation Orders
Curtis et al.
JAMA 1995;273:124-128.
ABSTRACT  

Limitations and Withdrawals of Medical Intervention in Pediatric Critical Care
Levetown et al.
JAMA 1994;272:1271-1275.
ABSTRACT  

Can We Talk? Inpatient Discussions About Advance Directives in a Community Hospital: Attending Physicians' Attitudes, Their Inpatients' Wishes, and Reported Experience
Reilly et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:2299-2308.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of a Treatment Limitation Policy With a Specific Treatment-Limiting Order Page
O'Toole et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:425-432.
ABSTRACT  

Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Intensive Care Units: Current Practices and Recent Changes
Jayes et al.
JAMA 1993;270:2213-2217.
ABSTRACT  

Impact of a Procedure-Specific Do Not Resuscitate Order Form on Documentation of Do Not Resuscitate Orders
Mittelberger et al.
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:228-232.
ABSTRACT  

The Quality of Mercy: Caring for Patients With 'Do Not Resuscitate' Orders
Sulmasy et al.
JAMA 1992;267:682-686.
ABSTRACT  

Factors Associated With Veterans' Decisions About Living Wills
Sugarman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:343-347.
ABSTRACT  

The Patient Self-Determination Act and the Future of Advance Directives
Greco et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1991;115:639-643.
ABSTRACT  

Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders
Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American
JAMA 1991;265:1868-1871.
ABSTRACT  

Psychological Androgyny and Preference for Intubation in a Nypothetical Case of End-stage Lung Disease
Yarnold et al.
Med Decis Making 1990;10:215-222.
ABSTRACT  

Geriatrics
Cohen and Lyles
JAMA 1989;261:2847-2848.
ABSTRACT  

Assessing Hospital-Associated Deaths
Wagner
JAMA 1989;261:2331-2331.
ABSTRACT  

'Do Not Resuscitate' Orders: Accepting Responsibility
Bartholome
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2345-2346.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.