You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 148 No. 11, November 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Application of the Ambulatory 24-Hour Electrocardiogram in the Prediction of Cardiac Death in Dialysis Patients

John A. D'Elia, MD; Larry A. Weinrauch, MD; Ray E. Gleason, PhD; Linda A. Hampton, RN; Sherry Smith-Ossman, RN; David C. Yoburn, MD; Antoine Kaldany, MD; Robert W. Healy, MD; O. Stevens Leland, Jr, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(11):2381-2385.


Abstract

• The value of a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram (AmECG) in assessing the risk of cardiac death was studied in 122 stable-condition dialysis patients followed up from two to six years after monitoring. An abnormal AmECG was defined by second-degree or greater AV block or by Lown grade 3 or greater ventricular ectopy. The incidence of cardiac mortality or an abnormal AmECG was not influenced by hypokalemia or β-blockers. Digitalis was associated with both an abnormal AmECG and a twofold increase in mortality whether or not the AmECG was normal. Cardiac mortality accounted for 26 of 33 deaths within the first year after the AmECG. In the absence of coronary artery disease, survival at six months was 100% in patients with normal AmECG vs 90% (abnormal AmECG). In the presence of coronary artery disease, survival at six months was 83% (normal AmECG) vs 54% (abnormal AmECG).

(Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2381-2385)



Author Affiliations

From the John Cook Renal Unit, Joslin Diabetes Center (Drs D'Elia, Weinrauch, Gleason, Yoburn, and Kaldany, and Mss Hampton and Smith-Ossman), and the Department of Medicine, New England Deaconess Hospital, the Harvard Medical School (Drs D'Elia, Weinrauch, Gleason, Yoburn, Kaldany, Healy, and Leland), Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 24, 1988.

Presented in part at the Eastern Section Meeting, American Federation for Clinical Research, New York, Oct 10, 1986.

Reprint requests to John Cook Renal Unit, Joslin Diabetes Center, 1 Joslin Rd, Boston, MA 02215 (Dr D'Elia).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

ACC/AHA guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography) developed in collaboration with the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology
Crawford et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:912-948.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.