You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 148 No. 12, December 1, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Doppler echocardiography in adults with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness

C. M. Otto and A. S. Pearlman
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

To evaluate the diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness of Doppler echocardiography in adults with symptomatic aortic stenosis, we performed a prospective study in which the need for aortic valve replacement (AVR) was the outcome event. The total sample consisted of 103 adults (mean age, 69 years) undergoing cardiac catheterization for suspected aortic stenosis. Twenty-six patients (25%) were used as a training set to develop a clinical prediction rule. (1) If maximum aortic jet velocity (Vmax) was more than 4.0 m/s, AVR was recommended. (2) If Vmax was less than 3.0 m/s, AVR was not needed. (3) If Vmax was 3.0 to 4.0 m/s and (a) Doppler aortic valve area (AVA) was 1.0 cm2 or less, AVR was recommended, while (b) if Doppler AVA was 1.7 cm2 or greater, AVR was not needed, and (c) if Doppler AVA was 1.1 to 1.6 cm2, consideration of the degree of coexisting aortic insufficiency was necessary. When this rule was applied to the test set (n = 77), the sensitivity was 98%, with a specificity of 89% and a total error rate of 3.9%. The approach could have resulted in cost savings between 24% and 34% compared with an invasive diagnostic approach.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Features of the Metabolic Syndrome and Diabetes Mellitus as Predictors of Aortic Valve Calcification in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Katz et al.
Circulation 2006;113:2113-2119.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Change in Aortic Valve Calcium
O'Brien et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:858-862.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical efficacy of Doppler-echocardiographic indices of aortic valve stenosis:a comparative test-based analysis of outcome
Bermejo et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:142-151.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences
Bouma et al.
Heart 1999;82:143-148.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prospective Study of Asymptomatic Valvular Aortic Stenosis : Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Exercise Predictors of Outcome
Otto et al.
Circulation 1997;95:2262-2270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography : A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography
Cheitlin et al.
Circulation 1997;95:1686-1744.
FULL TEXT  

Where Does Ultrasound Stand in Technology Assessment and Outcomes Research: Issues, Methods, and Questions
Waggoner
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 1996;12:63-68.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.