You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 148 No. 12, December 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Analysis of Physician and Hospital Differences in 'Negative' Coronary Angiogram Rates

Peter E. Dans, MD; Jeanne C. Keruly, RN; Jeffrey A. Brinker, MD; Bernard Tabatznik, MD; Allan S. Pristoop, MD; Susan G. Buchanan, RN

Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(12):2633-2637.


Abstract

• A direct relationship has been postulated between high "negative" coronary angiogram rates and physician payment. We conducted a prospective study of coronary angiography in a teaching and community hospital staffed, respectively, by cardiologists who were performing cardiac catheterization as salaried or fee-for-service physicians. The lower overall rate of negative angiograms at the teaching hospital correlated with the presence of a cardiac surgery unit and the increased referral of patients with documented coronary artery disease. The percentage of completely normal angiograms did not differ significantly between hospitals. The number of angiograms positive by a 70% occlusion criterion in patients not previously known to have coronary artery disease also did not differ greatly. Negative angiogram rates appeared to vary inversely with physician ability to set preangiogram probabilities of coronary artery disease. Our findings do not discount reimbursement as a strong incentive, but suggest other important determinants of coronary angiographic variation.

(Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2633-2637)



Author Affiliations

From the Office of Medical Practice Evaluation (Dr Dans and Mss Keruly and Buchanan), the Divisions of Cardiology (Dr Brinker), and Internal Medicine (Dr Dans), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; and the Division of Cardiology, North Charles General Hospital (Drs Tabatznik and Pristoop), Baltimore.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 5, 1988.

Reprint requests to The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 550 N Broadway, Suite 201, Baltimore, MD 21205 (Dr Dans).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A simple score for predicting coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain
Wu et al.
QJM 2005;98:803-811.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is the Public being Protected? Prevention of Suboptimalmedical Practice Through Training Programs and Credentialing Examinations
Tamblyn
Eval Health Prof 1994;17:198-221.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.