You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 148 No. 5, May 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (45)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Living Kidney Donation

Attitudes Outside the Transplant Center

Aaron Spital, MD; Max Spital, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(5):1077-1080.


Abstract

• Many transplant centers are opposed to the use of living unrelated kidney donors and donors at added risk. To see how the public and nontransplant physicians view these issues, we surveyed samples of these groups in Rochester, NY. We found that the majority of respondents supports the use of unrelated donors and believes that donors should be allowed to accept added risk. Our findings were confirmed by a Gallup Poll of a random sample of the US adult population. It appears that many transplant centers are out of step with public opinion, as well as that of other members of the medical profession. We hope our data will induce the centers to become more attuned to public attitudes and give donors a greater voice in determining their own suitability. If this occurs, more donors will likely become available and the number of patients with end-stage renal disease receiving transplants will increase.

(Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1077-1080)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Nephrology, Rochester (NY) General Hospital, University of Rochester (NY) School of Medicine (Dr A. Spital), Rochester, NY; and the Department of Psychiatry, Cornell Medical Center—Westchester Division, White Plains, NY (Dr M. Spital).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 31, 1987.

Presented as a poster at the 19th annual meeting of the American Society of Nephrology, Washington, DC, Dec 9, 1986.

Reprint requests to Rochester General Hospital, 1425 Portland Ave, Rochester, NY 14621 (Dr A. Spital).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Panning for gold: screening for potential live kidney donors
Calder and Chang
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:1276-1280.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Solid Organ Donation Between Strangers
Ross
J Law Med Ethics 2002;30:440-445.
 

Ethics of a Paired-Kidney-Exchange Program
Ross et al.
NEJM 1997;336:1752-1755.
FULL TEXT  

Living Organ Donation Is Still Ethically Acceptable-Reply
Kleinman and Lowy
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:529-530.
ABSTRACT  

Ethical Considerations in Living Organ Donation and a New Approach: An Advance-Directive Organ Registry
Kleinman and Lowy
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:1484-1488.
ABSTRACT  

Living Organ Donation: Shifting Responsibility
Spital
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:234-235.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.