This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Correction  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Idelle M. Weisman, MD; R. Jorge Zeballos, MD; Timothy W. Martin, MD; Bruce D. Johnson, MS

Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(5):1140-1144.

Abstract
• In order to determine if sickle-cell trait (SCT) represents an inherent adverse effect on response to training, we objectively evaluated exercise performance in 22 healthy, black men with SCT (hemoglobin AS) and 15 controls (hemoglobin AA) before and after seven weeks of army basic training at an altitude of 1270 m. An incremental exercise test to exhaustion on a cycle ergometer was used. Before basic training, peak exercise measurements did not reveal significant differences between groups other than a slightly lower, albeit significant, value for oxygen uptake (Vo₂) per kilogram (42±1 vs 45±1.4 mL/min per kilogram) for the SCT group. Both groups experienced modest overall cardiovascular improvement reflected in both peak and submaximal exercise responses. No statistically significant difference was observed between the SCT and the control groups at the end of basic training for any of the measured variables at peak exercise, including power (258±6 vs 266±9W), Vo₂ (3.24±.06 vs 3.36±.16 L/min), Vo₂ per kilogram (46±0.7 vs 46±1.2), minute ventilation (138±4 vs 147±8 L/min), heart rate (185±2 vs 184±3 beats per minute), oxygen pulse (17.6±.3 vs 18.4±1 mL/min per beat), as well as anaerobic threshold (1.81±.04 vs 1.80±.06 L/min), respectively. No medical problems directly attributed to SCT were reported; it remains uncertain, however, whether a seizure experienced by one of the other SCT basic trainees after a two-mile run was SCT related. The results of this study would, therefore, suggest that for the majority of individuals who possess SCT, the response to the moderate training regimen provided by army basic training is not impaired.

(Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1140-1144)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Clinical Investigation, Sickle-Cell Trait Research Project, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Tex.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Jan 22, 1988.

Dr Johnson is currently with the John Rankin Laboratory of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

This work was presented, in part, at the 33rd annual meeting of the American College of Sports Medicine, Indianapolis, May 1986.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or Department of Defense.

Reprint requests to Department of Clinical Investigation, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX 79920-5001 (Dr Weisman).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Point:Counterpoint: Sickle cell trait should/should not be considered asymptomatic and as a benign condition during physical activity
Le Gallais et al.
J. Appl. Physiol. 2007;103:2137-2138.
FULL TEXT  

Sickle-Cell Trait and Physical Training: Evidence for Improved Fitness
Rodgers
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1019-1020.
ABSTRACT