You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 148 No. 5, May 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A History of Hypercholesterolemia Influences Cholesterol Measurements

Gordon Schectman, MD; Raymond G. Hoffmann, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(5):1169-1171.


Abstract

• Elevated plasma cholesterol levels identified during cholesterol screening are often lower when repeated because of the regression to the mean effect. We evaluated the effect of the presence or absence of a history of hypercholesterolemia on the regression to the mean phenomenon. Of 564 volunteers undergoing cholesterol screening, 53 subjects between the ages of 20 and 65 years found to have total plasma cholesterol levels above the 90th percentile for age and sex returned for a second determination. No dietary or behavioral changes occurred during the study. Individuals with a history of hypercholesterolemia showed no change in plasma cholesterol level between the first and second visits; however, a net 13.1% reduction in mean plasma cholesterol level was observed in the group without this history, with 59% of subjects dropping below the 90th percentile level. These findings demonstrate that the regression to the mean effect is confined to those individuals who do not report a history of hyperlipidemia. Subjects with this history are more likely to have their initial cholesterol elevation confirmed when the test is repeated.

(Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1169-1171)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Internal Medicine (Dr Schectman) and the Department of Biostatistics (Dr Hoffmann), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 7, 1988.

Reprint requests to Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8700 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (Dr Schectman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it
Barnett et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:215-220.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of a Public Cholesterol Screening Program
Fischer et al.
Arch Intern Med 1990;150:2567-2572.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.