You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 148 No. 6, June 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Methodologic Problems in Exercise Testing Research

Are We Solving Them?

Robert Detrano, MD, PhD; Kenneth P. Lyons, MD; Gilberto Marcondes, MD; Nabil Abbassi, MD; Victor F. Froelicher, MD; Andras Janosi, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(6):1289-1295.


Abstract



• To evaluate the comparative effects of methodologic factors on the reported accuracies of two standard exercise tests, 56 publications comparing the exercise thallium scintigram with the coronary angiogram were analyzed for conformation to five methodologic standards. Analyzed were adequate definition of study group, avoidance of a limited challenge group, avoidance of workup bias, and blinded analysis of the coronary angiogram and myocardial scintigram. Study group characteristics and technical factors were also reviewed. Better conformation with methodologic standards was found than has been reported previously for treadmill exercise testing. Furthermore, study group characteristics and technical factors were better predictors of sensitivity and specificity than were methodologic deficiencies. Only workup bias and test blinding were significantly associated with test accuracy. The percentage of patients with previous myocardial infarction had the highest correlation and was independently and directly related to sensitivity and inversely related to specificity.

(Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1289-1295)



Author Affiliations



From the Long Beach (Calif) Veterans Administration Medical Center (Drs Detrano, Lyons, Marcondes, Abbassi, and Froelicher) and the Hungarian Institute of Cardiology, Budapest (Dr Janosi). Dr Janosi was a traveling fellow sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Oct 13, 1987.

Reprint requests to Long Beach Veterans Administration Medical Center, 5901 E Seventh St, Long Beach, CA 90822 (Dr Detrano).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: A Systematic Review
Whiting et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:189-202.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of 1,764 patients
Haberl et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:451-457.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Exercise Thallium-201 Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Coronary Artery Disease
Kotler and Diamond
ANN INTERN MED 1990;113:684-702.
ABSTRACT  

The Reliability of Probability Analysis in the Prediction of Coronary Artery Disease in Two Hospitals
Guppy et al.
Med Decis Making 1989;9:181-189.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.