You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 148 No. 6, June 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Unproven Utility of Preoperative Urinalysis

Clinical Use

Valerie A. Lawrence, MD; Kurt Kroenke, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(6):1370-1373.


Abstract



• We investigated the utility, ie, relevance to clinical outcome, of routine preoperative urinalysis with a retrospective study of 200 clean-wound, orthopedic, nonprosthetic knee procedures. Physicians primarily order a preoperative urinalysis to detect infection, because of the purported relationship between remote infection and surgical wound infection. We found that preoperative urinalysis is uniformly ordered, with a high prevalence of abnormal results (15%) but a low physician-response rate (29%). Wound infection was rare, but there was no difference in frequency of wound infection between patients with normal and abnormal results of urinalysis. We conclude that the utility of routine preoperative urinalysis is unproven. Current practice does not agree with the rationale for ordering this test, nor does published literature support it. Although data are inadequate to fully define the appropriate use of preoperative urinalysis, we suggest clinical recommendations and avenues for further research.

(Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1370-1373)



Author Affiliations



From the Departments of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Audie L. Murphy Memorial Veterans Hospital, San Antonio, and Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Dec 1, 1987.

Reprint requests to Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78284 (Dr Lawrence).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Yield and Cost of Individual Common Diagnostic Tests in New Primary Care Outpatients in Japan
Takemura et al.
Clin. Chem. 2002;48:42-54.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preoperative Evaluation of the Patient for Vascular Surgery in the "Real World"
Foss
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 2000;4:213-222.
ABSTRACT  

Cost-effective Preoperative Evaluation and Testing
Fischer
Chest 1999;115:96S-100S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Case Against Screening Urinalyses for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Children
Kemper and Avner
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1992;146:343-346.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.