You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 148 No. 6, June 1, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Two models of implementing informed consent

C. W. Lidz, P. S. Appelbaum and A. Meisel
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

The doctrine of informed consent has been controversial since its inception. In spite of the professed ideal of improving physician-patient communication, many commentators have argued that it interferes with the relationship. However, the problem may not be the doctrine itself but rather the manner in which it is usually implemented. This article describes two different ways in which informed consent can be implemented. The event model treats informed consent as a procedure to be performed once in each treatment course, which must cover all legal elements at that time. The process model, in contrast, tries to integrate informing the patient into the continuing dialogue between physician and patient that is a routine part of diagnosis and treatment. We suggest that the process model has many benefits.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Issues concerning informed consent for medical research among non-westernized ethnic minority patients in the UK
Dein and Bhui
JRSM 2005;98:354-356.
FULL TEXT  

Improving Informed Consent and Enhancing Recruitment for Research by Understanding Economic Behavior
Dunn and Gordon
JAMA 2005;293:609-612.
FULL TEXT  

A Typology of Shared Decision Making, Informed Consent, and Simple Consent
Whitney et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:54-59.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Discussing Treatment Options and Risks With Medical Patients Who Have Psychiatric Problems
Ness
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2037-2044.
FULL TEXT  

"What Should I Do, Doc?": Some Psychologic Benefits of Physician Recommendations
Ubel
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:977-980.
FULL TEXT  

Long-term Ventilation for Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy : Physicians' Beliefs and Practices
Gibson
Chest 2001;119:940-946.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informed Proxy Consent: Communication Between Pediatric Surgeons and Surrogates About Surgery
Lashley et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:591-597.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital Informed Consent for Procedure Forms: Facilitating Quality Patient-Physician Interaction
Bottrell et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:26-33.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informed Decision Making in Outpatient Practice: Time to Get Back to Basics
Braddock III et al.
JAMA 1999;282:2313-2320.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are Patients Capable of Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Willing to Use It to Help Make Clinical Decisions?
Dolan
Med Decis Making 1995;15:76-80.
ABSTRACT  

Truce on the Battlefield: A Proposal for a Different Approach to Medical Informed Consent
Piper
J Law Med Ethics 1994;22:301-313.
 

Informed Consent in Pediatric Oncology: A Nursing Perspective
Ruccione
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing 1994;11:128-133.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.