You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 148 No. 6, June 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (112)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Two Models of Implementing Informed Consent

Charles W. Lidz, PhD; Paul S. Appelbaum, MD; Alan Meisel, JD

Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(6):1385-1389.


Abstract



• The doctrine of informed consent has been controversial since its inception. In spite of the professed ideal of improving physician-patient communication, many commentators have argued that it interferes with the relationship. However, the problem may not be the doctrine itself but rather the manner in which it is usually implemented. This article describes two different ways in which informed consent can be implemented. The event model treats informed consent as a procedure to be performed once in each treatment course, which must cover all legal elements at that time. The process model, in contrast, tries to integrate informing the patient into the continuing dialogue between physician and patient that is a routine part of diagnosis and treatment. We suggest that the process model has many benefits.

(Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1385-1389)



Author Affiliations



From the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Pittsburgh, and the University of Pittsburgh Center for Medical Ethics (Drs Lidz and Meisel) and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester (Dr Appelbaum).


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Nov 12, 1987.

Reprint requests to Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, 3811O'Hara St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (Dr Lidz).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Dialectical Perspective on Informed Consent to Treatment: An Examination of Radiologists' Dilemmas and Negotiations
Olufowote
Qual Health Res 2011;21:839-852.
ABSTRACT  

A Structurational Analysis of Informed Consent to Treatment: (Re)productions of Contradictory Sociohistorical Structures in Practitioners' Interpretive Schemes
Olumide Olufowote
Qual Health Res 2009;19:802-814.
ABSTRACT  

Informed Consent Revisited: A Doctrine in the Service of Cancer Care
Schachter and Fins
The Oncologist 2008;13:1109-1113.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Making a difference: incorporating theories of autonomy into models of informed consent
Delany
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:e3-e3.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Issues concerning informed consent for medical research among non-westernized ethnic minority patients in the UK
Dein and Bhui
JRSM 2005;98:354-356.
FULL TEXT  

Improving Informed Consent and Enhancing Recruitment for Research by Understanding Economic Behavior
Dunn and Gordon
JAMA 2005;293:609-612.
FULL TEXT  

A Typology of Shared Decision Making, Informed Consent, and Simple Consent
Whitney et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:54-59.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Discussing Treatment Options and Risks With Medical Patients Who Have Psychiatric Problems
Ness
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2037-2044.
FULL TEXT  

"What Should I Do, Doc?": Some Psychologic Benefits of Physician Recommendations
Ubel
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:977-980.
FULL TEXT  

Long-term Ventilation for Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy : Physicians' Beliefs and Practices
Gibson
Chest 2001;119:940-946.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informed Proxy Consent: Communication Between Pediatric Surgeons and Surrogates About Surgery
Lashley et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:591-597.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital Informed Consent for Procedure Forms: Facilitating Quality Patient-Physician Interaction
Bottrell et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:26-33.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informed Decision Making in Outpatient Practice: Time to Get Back to Basics
Braddock III et al.
JAMA 1999;282:2313-2320.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Adult-Onset Cancer: The Process and Content of Informed Consent
Geller et al.
JAMA 1997;277:1467-1474.
ABSTRACT  

The Call of the Sirens: Navigating the Ethics of Medication-Free Research in Schizophrenia
Fins and Miller
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997;54:415-416.
ABSTRACT  

Legal and Ethical Myths About Informed Consent
Meisel and Kuczewski
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:2521-2526.
ABSTRACT  

Are Patients Capable of Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Willing to Use It to Help Make Clinical Decisions?
Dolan
Med Decis Making 1995;15:76-80.
ABSTRACT  

Informed Consent in Pediatric Oncology: A Nursing Perspective
Ruccione
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing 1994;11:128-133.
 

Informed Consent in Emergency Research: Prehospital Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Grim et al.
JAMA 1989;262:252-255.
ABSTRACT  

Informed Consent: An Improved Perspective
Connelly
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1266-1268.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.