You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 1, January 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Selective Criteria May Increase Lumbosacral Spine Roentgenogram Use in Acute Low-Back Pain

Linda M. Frazier, MD; Timothy S. Carey, MD; Mary F. Lyles, MD; Moise A. Khayrallah, MA; William C. McGaghie, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(1):47-50.


Abstract

• Eleven clinical criteria have been proposed to limit use of lumbosacral spine roentgenograms in patients with acute low-back pain who are at risk for vertebral cancer, osteomyelitis, acute fracture, or herniated disk. We retrospectively applied the criteria to 471 patients with acute low-back pain in three teaching hospital walk-in clinics. Roentgenograms were obtained at the initial visit in 99 patients (21.1%); the number would have increased to 217 (46.1%) if the criteria had been used. The following four patient characteristics were associated with actual roentgenogram use: older age, longer duration of symptoms, reflex asymmetry, and point vertebral tenderness. Adoption of the 11 criteria studied herein may inadvertently increase roentgenogram use, thereby raising health care costs and exposing more patients to gonadal irradiation. The standard of practice in these three clinics seemed to entail use of less broad roentgenogram selection criteria. Other published guidelines for roentgenograms emphasize clinical follow-up, reserving further evaluation for patients who fail to improve after a trial of bed rest and analgesics.

(Arch Intern Med 1989;149:47-50)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (Dr Frazier); the Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology (Dr Carey), the School of Education (Mr Khayrallah), and the Office of Research and Development for Education in the Health Professions (Dr McGaghie), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; and the Division of Geriatrics, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (Dr Lyles). Dr Frazier is now with the Division of Occupational Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 5, 1988.

Read before the meeting of the Society for General Internal Medicine, New Orleans, Feb 5, 1987.

Reprint requests to Duke University Medical Center, Box 2914, Durham, NC 27710 (Dr Frazier).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Low-Back Pain and Intravenous Drug Abusers-Reply
FRAZIER
Arch Intern Med 1990;150:1128-1128.
ABSTRACT  

Low-Back Pain and Intravenous Drug Abusers
CHANDRASEKAR
Arch Intern Med 1990;150:1125-1128.
ABSTRACT  

Plain Roentgenography for Low-Back Pain: Finding Needles in a Haystack
DEYO
Arch Intern Med 1989;149:27-29.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.