You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 10, October 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  SPECIAL ARTICLE
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower

XIV: Patterns of Residency and Fellowship Over Time, 1987 Update

Claire H. Kohrman, PhD; Christopher S. Lyttle, MA; Ronald M. Andersen, PhD; Gerald S. Levey, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(10):2179-2185.


Abstract



• In response to concerns among internists following the 1987 internal medicine match, this report compares internal medicine trainees with those in other specialties since 1972, describes their paths through the internal medicine "pipeline," and documents their distribution and continuation rates in residency and subspecialty fellowship programs. It is based on the National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower, 1987-1988. Between 1972 and 1986 the number of trainees in internal medicine doubled, and the percentage of trainees in internal medicine grew from 20% to 25%, while the percentage in surgical specialties declined from 28% to 19%. The numbers of women and foreign medical school graduates training in internal medicine have continued to increase, but minority representation has stabilized. Women and minorities have lower continuation rates into fellowships, and distinctive patterns of subspecialization are found among women, minorities, and foreign medical school graduates.

(Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:2179-2185)



Author Affiliations



From the Center for Health Administration Studies, University of Chicago, Ill (Drs Kohrman and Andersen and Mr Lyttle); and the Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pa (Dr Levey).


Footnotes



Accepted for publication March 23, 1989.

Reprint requests to Center for Health Administration Studies, The University of Chicago, 1101 E 58th St, Chicago, IL 60637 (Dr Andersen).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Geriatrics Imperative: Meeting the Need for Physicians Trained in Geriatric Medicine
Chiang
JAMA 1998;279:1036-1037.
FULL TEXT  

Internal Medicine: No Longer a Primary Care Specialty?
Zelicoff
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:616-616.
ABSTRACT  

Internal Medicine: No Longer a Primary Care Specialty?-Reply
Kohrman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:616-617.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.