 |
|
Age Criteria in MedicineAre the Medical Justifications Ethical?
John F. Kilner, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(10):2343-2346.
Abstract
• Age criteria are increasingly being advocated as means of determining who should receive treatment. Four types of medical justification have been proposed. Three of these, namely, length of medical benefit, quality of medical benefit, and likelihood of medical benefit, entail comparisons of patients. The fourth, medical benefit, involves identifying for each patient whether or not a significant benefit is likely to result from treatment. I contend that the three types of comparative justification are questionable. For example, they rest on statistical generalities that are misleading in particular situations, and they value characteristics of persons (such as life-years) more than they respect persons themselves. I also contend that the fourth type of medical justification, rooted as it is in response to human need, is ethically sound, but that it warrants a medical-benefit criterion rather than an age criterion.
(Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:2343-2346)
Author Affiliations
From Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass, the University of Kentucky, Lexington, and Asbury Theological Seminary, Wilmore, Ky.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication June 5,1989.
Reprint requests to 451 Retrac Rd, Lexington, KY 40503 (Dr Kilner).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Delicious  Digg  Facebook  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Intensive Care for Critically Ill Elderly: Mortality, Costs, and Quality of Life: Review of the Literature
Chelluri et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1013-1022.
ABSTRACT
Diuretics, Potassium, and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Clarfield et al.
JAMA 1992;268:52-52.
ABSTRACT
The Do-Not-Resuscitate Order: Still Too Little Too Late
Gleeson
Arch Intern Med 1990;150:1057-1060.
ABSTRACT
|
