 |
 |

Feasibility and Safety of Emergency Interhospital Transport of Patients During Early Hours of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Joel M. Gore, MD;
Jeanne M. Corrao, RN, BSN;
Robert J. Goldberg, PhD;
Steven P. Ball, RN;
Bonnie H. Weiner, MD;
Richard V. Aghababian, MD;
James E. Dalen, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(2):353-355.
Abstract
 |  |
The transfer of patients with acute myocardial infarction from community hospitals to tertiary care facilities for further intervention has become increasingly more frequent due to the emerging role of thrombolytic therapy and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. To assess the feasibility and safety of early transfer, a prospective analysis of 57 patients who were transported by ground ambulance or helicopter to the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, for acute intervention during the early hours of myocardial infarction was conducted. Before transport, the majority (46 [81%]) of patients were having chest discomfort, 13 (23%) were hypotensive, and 12 (21%) were electrically unstable (defined as high-grade ventricular ectopia or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia). During transport, the majority (41 [72%]) continued to have some chest discomfort; however, only two (4%) remained hypotensive. Although five patients (9%) were electrically unstable during transport, the instability was considered noncritical. The distance traveled or the mode of transportation did not adversely impact on these clinical complications. All patients survived transport, and 53 patients (93%) were eventually discharged from the receiving hospital.
(Arch Intern Med 1989;149:353-355)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Sept 20, 1988.
Reprint requests to Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave N, Worcester, MA 01655 (Dr Gore).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
International Aeromedical Evacuation
Teichman et al.
NEJM 2007;356:262-270.
FULL TEXT
The Case for Community Hospital Angioplasty
Wharton et al.
Circulation 2005;112:3509-3534.
FULL TEXT
Angioplasty vs thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative overview of the effects of interhospital transportation
Zijlstra
Eur Heart J 2003;24:21-23.
FULL TEXT
A randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction: The air primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction study
Grines et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1713-1719.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Acute myocardial infarction occurring in versus out of the hospital: patient characteristics and clinical outcome
Zahn et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1820-1826.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Helicopter Transfer Offers a Potential Benefit to Patients With Acute Stroke
Conroy et al.
Stroke 1999;30:2580-2584.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Infarct angioplasty
DE BELDER and HALL
Heart 1999;82:399-401.
FULL TEXT
Transferring patients for primary angioplasty: a retrospective analysis of 104 selected high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction
Zijlstra et al.
Heart 1997;78:333-336.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|